{"schema":"ai-blocks-role/1","id":"take-over-a-team-as-its-new-leader","name":"Team leader introduction planner","summary":"Give it the team: who they are, their roles and how long they have been there. You get a first message to the team in your own voice.","area":"people","family":{"id":"lead-people","name":"Lead and manage people"},"lead":"take-over-a-team-as-its-new-leader","featured":false,"contextKind":"personal","deliverables":["A first message to the team in your own voice","A listening tour plan with the questions for each person","A read of whether the team is in peacetime or wartime, and what that changes","A results agreement with each person"],"inputs":["The team: who they are, their roles and how long they have been there","What you were brought in to do and by whom","What you know of the situation: numbers, morale, what happened before you","Your own way of working"],"opening":{"give":["The team: who they are, their roles and how long they have been there","What you were brought in to do and by whom","What you know of the situation: numbers, morale, what happened before you"],"get":["A first message to the team in your own voice","A listening tour plan with the questions for each person","A read of whether the team is in peacetime or wartime, and what that changes","A results agreement with each person"]},"helpfulInputs":["The last leader's notes or handover","The team's current goals and numbers","Exit interviews from recent leavers"],"fit":["You start as manager of an existing team next week.","You have bought or inherited a business and its people.","You took over six months ago and it has not settled."],"limits":["You only cover a team for a week: skip this and send a short note to the team with who to call and what stays the same.","You have one person with a performance problem: hold a plain one-to-one with that person instead of a full team takeover.","You already know the team well and only need goals for the year: set the goals with the team directly and agree them in your next one-to-ones."],"tools":["Any good chat AI: Every step is a plan or a piece of writing.","Your calendar: Book the whole listening tour in the first two weeks.","Claude, ChatGPT or Gemini: Turning your own facts into a short, ordered message is text work. No files, web access or paid tools needed.","Your email app: Paste the draft in and read it as the team will, on a screen, before you send.","Claude, ChatGPT or Gemini: Planning and rewording are text work. No files, web access or paid tools needed.","A friend to practise with: Say the listening phase out loud once. Reading it silently hides how hard it is not to answer back.","Any good chat AI: Weighing evidence for a call is text work. Claude, ChatGPT and Gemini all do it with this skill.","Your finance sheet or dashboard: Cash months, growth and churn move the call more than words do. Copy in the figures you trust.","Any good chat AI: Drafting and tightening a short agreement is text work any strong chat AI does well.","A shared document: Both sides can read, edit and sign off the same page."],"method":["Download the handoff pack. It's a zip with HANDOFF.md and every skill file this workflow uses.","Give the folder to Claude (in Claude Code, or as files in a Claude Project) and say \"Follow HANDOFF.md\".","Paste the team, your brief and what you know. It writes the first message and the listening tour.","Send the message and hold the one-to-ones. Paste your notes.","Read the situation call, then agree results with each person in the next one-to-one."],"capabilities":[{"name":"Write your first message","description":"Writes your first message: who you are, how you work, what you will not change yet, in the manner of Nadella's first-day email."},{"name":"Plan the listening tour","description":"Plans a one-to-one with each person that hears them first, with the questions to ask."},{"name":"Listen first","description":"A pause. Send the message and hold the listening tour. Write down what each person said."},{"name":"Read the situation","description":"Calls peacetime or wartime from your notes and the numbers, in Horowitz's terms, and says what that changes."},{"name":"Agree results with each person","description":"Writes a results agreement per person: result, guidelines, resources, measures and consequences, in Covey's manner."}],"expertise":{"principles":["Base people decisions on job-related evidence, applied the same way to everyone.","Write in plain, respectful language the person affected could read.","Keep personal data to what the task needs, and handle it privately.","Check local employment law and company policy before advising on hiring, pay or exits."],"pitfalls":["Biased wording in job ads, reviews or interview questions.","Plans with no owner, timing or way to check progress.","Treating a template as legal advice."],"quality":["Each step passed its own checks, or the run stopped at the step that failed and says why.","The steps ran in order, and each one used the result of the one before.","Nothing was invented to fill a gap. Every gap is a MISSING: line.","Nothing was sent, published or paid for without a clear yes.","Criteria are written down before people are assessed.","Every plan has milestones and owners.","Sensitive steps are marked for human and legal review."],"sources":{"learned":0,"curated":false,"method":4,"source":0,"area":"people"}},"workedExample":{"situation":"You start as manager of an existing team next week.","task":"Give it the team: who they are, their roles and how long they have been there. Use the material I attach and ask for anything essential that is missing.","given":["Your team: who they are, their roles and how long they have been there","What you were brought in to do, and by whom","What you know of the situation: numbers, morale, what happened before you","Your own way of working","Your notes from each one-to-one (added after the listening tour)"],"outputs":[{"name":"First message","contains":"A note to the team on who you are, how you work, what stays for now and when they hear more."},{"name":"Listening tour","contains":"A one-to-one plan for each person, with when to meet and what to ask them."},{"name":"Situation read","contains":"A call of peacetime or wartime, the evidence for it, how you lead this quarter and what you stop."},{"name":"Results agreements","contains":"One agreement per person with the result, guidelines, resources, how it is measured and what follows."},{"name":"HAND-BACK SUMMARY","contains":"Each step's file, any step not run and why, and every MISSING line in one list."}]},"example":"Give it the team: who they are, their roles and how long they have been there. Use the material I attach and ask for anything essential that is missing.","functions":[{"name":"Team leader introduction planner","description":"Share your leadership brief and team context. Get an introduction draft, listening plan and proposed results agreements after real conversations.","method":"take-over-a-team-as-its-new-leader","when":["You start as manager of an existing team next week.","You have bought or inherited a business and its people.","You took over six months ago and it has not settled."],"inputs":["The team: who they are, their roles and how long they have been there","What you were brought in to do and by whom","What you know of the situation: numbers, morale, what happened before you","Your own way of working"],"deliverables":["A first message to the team in your own voice","A listening tour plan with the questions for each person","A read of whether the team is in peacetime or wartime, and what that changes","A results agreement with each person"]},{"name":"New leader first message writer","description":"Write your first message as a new leader. Get a one-page note covering who you are, why you are here and what happens next.","method":"new-leader-first-message-writer","when":["You start a new role next week and need your first email to the team.","You took over a team after a leader left, and people are waiting to hear from you.","You run a small business and are bringing in a manager, or stepping in as one.","You are promoted from inside the team and need to say what changes and what stays."],"inputs":["Your background and one small, true personal memory that shaped how you lead","The team's situation: what they do, who led them before, what has changed and what is hard","Names of the people who built the team before you (optional)","What you will change soon and what you will leave alone (optional)","How formal the team is (optional)"],"deliverables":["A one-page first message, ready to edit and send","The four questions answered in order","A thank-you to the people before you, and a line on what stays the same","One honest line on what you do not know, and one ask","A list of facts you still need to fill in"]},{"name":"Listening conversation planner","description":"Prepare a hard conversation. Get a plan to listen until they feel heard, say your side once and agree one next step with a date.","method":"listen-first-talk-planner","when":["You must tell a colleague something they will not like.","A client or partner is upset and you want to settle it face to face.","A family talk keeps ending in an argument.","You have already tried once, it went badly, and you want a better second go."],"inputs":["Who the person is and what the issue is, with what has happened so far","What you want from the talk","What you think they feel, as your own guess (optional)","How long you will have, and where (optional)","What you fear they will say (optional)"],"deliverables":["A plan for the setting and for giving them the floor","A list of the urges you will feel to defend yourself, each with a quiet response","Five to eight phrases that show you understood, plus a check that they feel heard","Your side in three or four sentences, and two curious questions","One next step with a date and an owner"]},{"name":"Business crisis mode reviewer","description":"Is your company in peacetime or wartime? Get a call backed by evidence, a plan to lead in that mode and a signal to switch.","method":"wartime-or-peacetime-check","when":["Results are slipping and you cannot tell if it is a blip or a threat.","People keep proposing a pivot.","Your team argues over details while cash falls.","A big rival has just made a move and you do not know how hard to react."],"inputs":["Your situation: what you sell, who to, how you are doing and what worries you","Numbers you trust, such as growth, cash months or churn (optional)","The shortcut people want, such as a pivot or a deal (optional)","How long you can wait for evidence (optional)"],"deliverables":["A call on peacetime or wartime, with the evidence on each side","A plan for that mode, including what to stop","A test of the shortcut people want","What the team hears, and how often","A signal that tells you the mode has changed"]},{"name":"Work expectations agreement writer","description":"Write a results agreement for a job you hand off or a deal you settle. You get one page on results, limits, help, review and what follows.","method":"results-agreement-writer","when":["You are handing a job to a team member, a child, a contractor or a volunteer.","Two sides are about to agree on a deal and want the same picture of success.","A past handoff went wrong because nobody agreed what done meant."],"inputs":["The job or deal, with what, who and when","How experienced the owner is, or what the other side cares about (optional)","A sorted list or a third option from earlier skills (optional)"],"deliverables":["A one-page agreement with results, guidelines, resources, accountability and consequences","A choice of how much structure fits the person","An exit clause and a trust line for a two-sided deal","A say-it-back card of five lines"]},{"name":"me.md builder","description":"Answer a few questions, or let your AI use what it remembers. Get one private file that tells any AI who you are.","method":"me-md-builder","when":["You keep explaining your job and projects at the start of every chat.","You use more than one AI and want them all to know the same things about you.","Your AI gives you answers that don't sound like you or don't fit your work."],"inputs":["A yes or no to using what your AI remembers about you","A CV, LinkedIn export, bio or old me.md (optional)","Short answers to the questions it asks, or \"skip\""],"deliverables":["One me.md file with up to ten dated sections","A list of facts taken from memory, for you to check","A short note of what it removed for privacy","The two next steps, to save it and set it up"]},{"name":"Stephen Covey","description":"Plan priorities, handoffs or a hard talk using Stephen Covey’s recorded approach. State the goal, listen first and agree a next step.","method":"stephen-covey","when":["Sort a crowded to-do list into urgent and important, and protect time for what matters","Write a short personal or team mission statement you can test choices against","Prepare for a hard talk by listening first and planning how to show you understood","Find a third option when two people or two teams are stuck on 'my way or your way'","Separate what you can control from what you only worry about, and act on the first","Plan a week around your roles and goals instead of around the inbox","Rebuild trust after a mistake with small, kept promises","Design a team habit or ritual that keeps people learning and rested"],"inputs":["Your task or question","Your facts, numbers or draft (optional; it asks once if they matter)","A role for them, such as \"my investor\" (optional)"],"deliverables":["Your problem worked on the way Stephen Covey would: their questions, their method, their push-back","The answer or the work, in Stephen Covey's voice, using their ideas by name","Anything that goes beyond their public record, marked","One suggested next step"]},{"name":"Dale Carnegie","description":"Rewrite a tense message or prepare a people conversation using Dale Carnegie’s recorded approach. See the other side, give sincere credit and ask clearly.","method":"dale-carnegie","when":["Rewrite a tense email so the other person wants to help you","Give feedback on someone's work without making them defensive","Plan a first meeting so the other person does most of the talking","Turn a disagreement into a yes by finding what you already agree on","Prepare for a talk or a toast when you are nervous about speaking","Ask for a favour by starting from what the other person wants","Write a thank-you note that gives sincere, specific praise","Calm a worry by naming the worst case, accepting it and working to improve on it"],"inputs":["Your task or question","Your facts, numbers or draft (optional; it asks once if they matter)","A role for them, such as \"my investor\" (optional)"],"deliverables":["Your problem worked on the way Dale Carnegie would: their questions, their method, their push-back","The answer or the work, in Dale Carnegie's voice, using their ideas by name","Anything that goes beyond their public record, marked","One suggested next step"]}],"resources":[{"slug":"take-over-a-team-as-its-new-leader","name":"Team leader introduction planner","summary":"Share your leadership brief and team context. Get an introduction draft, listening plan and proposed results agreements after real conversations.","task":"lead-people","kind":"workflow","path":"/workflows/take-over-a-team-as-its-new-leader","revision":"49cf5e6c247dbe4ca32d1dfed9a37c4c3f0b178dc0113a260d48add87f741fa3","skillPath":"/skills/take-over-a-team-as-its-new-leader/SKILL.md","bundled":false,"onboarding":false},{"slug":"new-leader-first-message-writer","name":"New leader first message writer","summary":"Write your first message as a new leader. Get a one-page note covering who you are, why you are here and what happens next.","task":"lead-people","kind":"skill","path":"/skills/new-leader-first-message-writer","revision":"aa11046631ac9d6baee4f6edc3369b0a65022afd5940bd319b2ea0ba2d9868bb","skillPath":"/skills/new-leader-first-message-writer/SKILL.md","bundled":true,"onboarding":false},{"slug":"listen-first-talk-planner","name":"Listening conversation planner","summary":"Prepare a hard conversation. Get a plan to listen until they feel heard, say your side once and agree one next step with a date.","task":"lead-people","kind":"skill","path":"/skills/listen-first-talk-planner","revision":"1e4804d25c15dc21a47d4ddc455bce391d47d637abd2a3f8627e4c8e3431db8e","skillPath":"/skills/listen-first-talk-planner/SKILL.md","bundled":true,"onboarding":false},{"slug":"wartime-or-peacetime-check","name":"Business crisis mode reviewer","summary":"Is your company in peacetime or wartime? Get a call backed by evidence, a plan to lead in that mode and a signal to switch.","task":"think-and-decide","kind":"skill","path":"/skills/wartime-or-peacetime-check","revision":"b17d77677d6619e7eca87ca78d2c9d9393ddd635a1e493dda68d5ea900e1937f","skillPath":"/skills/wartime-or-peacetime-check/SKILL.md","bundled":true,"onboarding":false},{"slug":"results-agreement-writer","name":"Work expectations agreement writer","summary":"Write a results agreement for a job you hand off or a deal you settle. You get one page on results, limits, help, review and what follows.","task":"lead-people","kind":"skill","path":"/skills/results-agreement-writer","revision":"c459c628539433b2ba6f131ee660f640f7f2978ad0596e0071a2a65ea64878b8","skillPath":"/skills/results-agreement-writer/SKILL.md","bundled":true,"onboarding":false},{"slug":"me-md-builder","name":"me.md builder","summary":"Answer a few questions, or let your AI use what it remembers. Get one private file that tells any AI who you are.","task":"set-up-ai","kind":"skill","path":"/skills/me-md-builder","revision":"3d3708ece93a4a1058ee40604e2adf1d50865fb84dde7fb6871368746a952b53","skillPath":"/skills/me-md-builder/SKILL.md","bundled":false,"onboarding":true},{"slug":"stephen-covey","name":"Stephen Covey","summary":"Plan priorities, handoffs or a hard talk using Stephen Covey’s recorded approach. State the goal, listen first and agree a next step.","task":"think-with-minds","kind":"mind","path":"/minds/stephen-covey","revision":"d6b084dea5054d21e8c7a4cc41e68f95a7550940efaed0cc539f6792d6f4b5fe","skillPath":"/skills/stephen-covey/SKILL.md","bundled":false,"onboarding":false,"reviewer":true},{"slug":"dale-carnegie","name":"Dale Carnegie","summary":"Rewrite a tense message or prepare a people conversation using Dale Carnegie’s recorded approach. See the other side, give sincere credit and ask clearly.","task":"think-with-minds","kind":"mind","path":"/minds/dale-carnegie","revision":"92f55ccf646a63c0acf46fc981ccb97bc28dc4235506a19e00c3326249aa2f64","skillPath":"/skills/dale-carnegie/SKILL.md","bundled":false,"onboarding":false,"reviewer":true}],"resourceCount":8,"sourceChecks":{"completeMethods":8,"referenceValidation":"PASS"},"catalogueHash":"3c3567ac2dbda7b2ac0cfaa8c93d8da3818f66bdadd51f18d8ff9051d77fc8f3","evaluation":{"status":"NOT_RUN","rubric":[{"id":"c1","criterion":"Delivers: A first message to the team in your own voice"},{"id":"c2","criterion":"Delivers: A listening tour plan with the questions for each person"},{"id":"c3","criterion":"Delivers: A read of whether the team is in peacetime or wartime, and what that changes"},{"id":"c4","criterion":"Delivers: A results agreement with each person"},{"id":"c5","criterion":"Each step passed its own checks, or the run stopped at the step that failed and says why."},{"id":"c6","criterion":"The steps ran in order, and each one used the result of the one before."},{"id":"c7","criterion":"Nothing was invented to fill a gap. Every gap is a MISSING: line."},{"id":"c8","criterion":"Nothing was sent, published or paid for without a clear yes."},{"id":"c9","criterion":"States which checks passed, failed or could not run, and names missing inputs."}],"goldenTasks":[{"id":"g1","kind":"core","situation":"You start as manager of an existing team next week.","expect":["A first message to the team in your own voice","A listening tour plan with the questions for each person","A read of whether the team is in peacetime or wartime, and what that changes"]},{"id":"g2","kind":"core","situation":"You have bought or inherited a business and its people.","expect":["A first message to the team in your own voice","A listening tour plan with the questions for each person","A read of whether the team is in peacetime or wartime, and what that changes"]},{"id":"g-missing","kind":"missing-input","situation":"The request leaves out: The team: who they are, their roles and how long they have been there","expect":["Names the missing input and asks for it, or finishes only the parts that do not depend on it."]}],"note":"These checks are defined but have not been run against a model yet."},"version":{"number":3,"since":"2026-11-03","changes":[{"version":3,"date":"2026-11-03","what":"Source methods updated to new revisions."},{"version":2,"date":"2026-11-03","what":"Updated scope, deliverables or inputs. Updated worked example."},{"version":1,"date":"2026-11-02","what":"First recorded version."}]},"learning":{"rules":[],"maturity":{"level":0,"name":"Not measured yet","runs":0,"score":0,"editRatio":0,"acceptance":0,"critical":0,"next":"10 reviewed jobs, average check score 70%+"}},"worker":{"schema":"ai-blocks-specialist-worker/1","id":"take-over-a-team-as-its-new-leader","name":"Team leader introduction planner","interface":{"inputs":[{"type":"short_text","required":true}],"outputs":[{"type":"document","required":true}],"brief":"The current task in the workflow goal and supplied context.","handoff":"work/handoff.md indexes the actual native deliverables and checks. An index does not replace a requested implementation."},"identity":{"remit":"Give it the team: who they are, their roles and how long they have been there. You get a first message to the team in your own voice.","capabilities":[{"name":"Write your first message","description":"Writes your first message: who you are, how you work, what you will not change yet, in the manner of Nadella's first-day email."},{"name":"Plan the listening tour","description":"Plans a one-to-one with each person that hears them first, with the questions to ask."},{"name":"Listen first","description":"A pause. Send the message and hold the listening tour. Write down what each person said."},{"name":"Read the situation","description":"Calls peacetime or wartime from your notes and the numbers, in Horowitz's terms, and says what that changes."},{"name":"Agree results with each person","description":"Writes a results agreement per person: result, guidelines, resources, measures and consequences, in Covey's manner."}],"limits":["You only cover a team for a week: skip this and send a short note to the team with who to call and what stays the same.","You have one person with a performance problem: hold a plain one-to-one with that person instead of a full team takeover.","You already know the team well and only need goals for the year: set the goals with the team directly and agree them in your next one-to-ones."]},"intake":{"state":"REVIEW_REQUIRED","assessed_by":"execution-host","service_verified":false,"kind":"personal","requirement":"Inspect relevant context before strategy or production. This role's work depends on its me.md, not on brand research.","method":"me-md-builder","files":["me.md","work/context-check.md"],"discovery":"Read supplied facts, authorized me.md and the named business/project folder first. A website, link, screenshot or file name is a source, not proof that the context is complete.","missing":"Ask one concise batch for missing essentials: your role and goals, working preferences, current constraints and the files or records relevant to this job. Reuse answers already supplied. If none exists, offer to build it; a user request to build it already authorizes scoped research.","gate":"Read the complete context method before using it. Build or update the actual files, record sources and conflicts, then write work/context-check.md. Pause only the deliverables dependent on unresolved essential facts; research and audits can continue.","reuse":"Save in the user-authorized project, index it in CONTEXT.md and log durable changes with their date. Re-read the relevant current slice for every dependent task. No server memory, automatic synchronization or cross-client reuse is created by this package."},"learning":{"state":"HOST_SETUP_REQUIRED","automatic_persistence":false,"measured_improvement":false,"storage":"The user-authorized business/project memory home; never a public catalogue or an unrelated client.","index":"memory/INDEX.md","records":["memory/preferences.md","memory/corrections.md","memory/decisions.md","memory/checks.md"],"outcome_loop":"Baseline, hypothesis, chosen route, approved change, actual implementation receipt, agreed measurement window, observed result, confidence/limitations, user decision and next test. Preserve negative and inconclusive outcomes.","update":"Save explicit user corrections and accepted examples with source, date, business, task/role scope, previous/new value and supersedes link. Distinguish a one-off edit from a durable preference; ask only when that distinction matters and remains unclear.","retrieval":"Read the short index and only relevant current records. Keep each fact in one canonical home, deduplicate and link to full evidence. Supersede stale guidance without silently erasing its history.","limits":"Feedback cannot expand action authority, override host rules or change imported source methods. Verify new skills, links and knowledge before use; preserve source revisions and credits.","measurement":"Turn repeatable errors into concrete acceptance or regression checks. Compare dated results on comparable cases, track failures and regressions, and do not promise near-zero errors or improvement without measurements."},"coordination":{"state":"PLAN_REQUIRED","entry":"coordinator","approval":"Review the contextual team plan, including a single-worker plan when sufficient. Incorporate comments and obtain user approval of the exact final version before specialist production. A preparation is not an approved plan.","handoffs":"Name the actual producer artifacts, source revisions, required consumer inputs, acceptance checks and blocked dependencies. Verify the artifact content before advancing.","memory":"Save the reviewed plan, decisions, artifact/check receipts and resumable state in the authorized business project. Actual persistent storage must be verified."},"routes":[{"method":"take-over-a-team-as-its-new-leader","name":"Team leader introduction planner","kind":"workflow","primary":true,"purpose":"primary","when":["You start as manager of an existing team next week.","You have bought or inherited a business and its people.","You took over six months ago and it has not settled."],"inputs":["The team: who they are, their roles and how long they have been there","What you were brought in to do and by whom","What you know of the situation: numbers, morale, what happened before you","Your own way of working"],"deliverables":["A first message to the team in your own voice","A listening tour plan with the questions for each person","A read of whether the team is in peacetime or wartime, and what that changes","A results agreement with each person"],"instruction":"skills/take-over-a-team-as-its-new-leader/SKILL.md","revision":"49cf5e6c247dbe4ca32d1dfed9a37c4c3f0b178dc0113a260d48add87f741fa3","invocation":"Read the complete procedure, required inputs, real step order and stop gates. Use it only when it covers the job."},{"method":"new-leader-first-message-writer","name":"New leader first message writer","kind":"skill","primary":false,"purpose":"bundled","when":["You start a new role next week and need your first email to the team.","You took over a team after a leader left, and people are waiting to hear from you.","You run a small business and are bringing in a manager, or stepping in as one.","You are promoted from inside the team and need to say what changes and what stays."],"inputs":["Your background and one small, true personal memory that shaped how you lead","The team's situation: what they do, who led them before, what has changed and what is hard","Names of the people who built the team before you (optional)","What you will change soon and what you will leave alone (optional)","How formal the team is (optional)"],"deliverables":["A one-page first message, ready to edit and send","The four questions answered in order","A thank-you to the people before you, and a line on what stays the same","One honest line on what you do not know, and one ask","A list of facts you still need to fill in"],"instruction":"skills/new-leader-first-message-writer/SKILL.md","revision":"aa11046631ac9d6baee4f6edc3369b0a65022afd5940bd319b2ea0ba2d9868bb","invocation":"Read the complete skill and required references. Use it for the matching subtask, then check the stated deliverables."},{"method":"listen-first-talk-planner","name":"Listening conversation planner","kind":"skill","primary":false,"purpose":"bundled","when":["You must tell a colleague something they will not like.","A client or partner is upset and you want to settle it face to face.","A family talk keeps ending in an argument.","You have already tried once, it went badly, and you want a better second go."],"inputs":["Who the person is and what the issue is, with what has happened so far","What you want from the talk","What you think they feel, as your own guess (optional)","How long you will have, and where (optional)","What you fear they will say (optional)"],"deliverables":["A plan for the setting and for giving them the floor","A list of the urges you will feel to defend yourself, each with a quiet response","Five to eight phrases that show you understood, plus a check that they feel heard","Your side in three or four sentences, and two curious questions","One next step with a date and an owner"],"instruction":"skills/listen-first-talk-planner/SKILL.md","revision":"1e4804d25c15dc21a47d4ddc455bce391d47d637abd2a3f8627e4c8e3431db8e","invocation":"Read the complete skill and required references. Use it for the matching subtask, then check the stated deliverables."},{"method":"wartime-or-peacetime-check","name":"Business crisis mode reviewer","kind":"skill","primary":false,"purpose":"bundled","when":["Results are slipping and you cannot tell if it is a blip or a threat.","People keep proposing a pivot.","Your team argues over details while cash falls.","A big rival has just made a move and you do not know how hard to react."],"inputs":["Your situation: what you sell, who to, how you are doing and what worries you","Numbers you trust, such as growth, cash months or churn (optional)","The shortcut people want, such as a pivot or a deal (optional)","How long you can wait for evidence (optional)"],"deliverables":["A call on peacetime or wartime, with the evidence on each side","A plan for that mode, including what to stop","A test of the shortcut people want","What the team hears, and how often","A signal that tells you the mode has changed"],"instruction":"skills/wartime-or-peacetime-check/SKILL.md","revision":"b17d77677d6619e7eca87ca78d2c9d9393ddd635a1e493dda68d5ea900e1937f","invocation":"Read the complete skill and required references. Use it for the matching subtask, then check the stated deliverables."},{"method":"results-agreement-writer","name":"Work expectations agreement writer","kind":"skill","primary":false,"purpose":"bundled","when":["You are handing a job to a team member, a child, a contractor or a volunteer.","Two sides are about to agree on a deal and want the same picture of success.","A past handoff went wrong because nobody agreed what done meant."],"inputs":["The job or deal, with what, who and when","How experienced the owner is, or what the other side cares about (optional)","A sorted list or a third option from earlier skills (optional)"],"deliverables":["A one-page agreement with results, guidelines, resources, accountability and consequences","A choice of how much structure fits the person","An exit clause and a trust line for a two-sided deal","A say-it-back card of five lines"],"instruction":"skills/results-agreement-writer/SKILL.md","revision":"c459c628539433b2ba6f131ee660f640f7f2978ad0596e0071a2a65ea64878b8","invocation":"Read the complete skill and required references. Use it for the matching subtask, then check the stated deliverables."},{"method":"me-md-builder","name":"me.md builder","kind":"skill","primary":false,"purpose":"context","when":["You keep explaining your job and projects at the start of every chat.","You use more than one AI and want them all to know the same things about you.","Your AI gives you answers that don't sound like you or don't fit your work."],"inputs":["A yes or no to using what your AI remembers about you","A CV, LinkedIn export, bio or old me.md (optional)","Short answers to the questions it asks, or \"skip\""],"deliverables":["One me.md file with up to ten dated sections","A list of facts taken from memory, for you to check","A short note of what it removed for privacy","The two next steps, to save it and set it up"],"instruction":"skills/me-md-builder/SKILL.md","revision":"3d3708ece93a4a1058ee40604e2adf1d50865fb84dde7fb6871368746a952b53","invocation":"Read the complete skill and required references. Use it for the matching subtask, then check the stated deliverables."},{"method":"stephen-covey","name":"Stephen Covey","kind":"mind","primary":false,"purpose":"review","when":["Sort a crowded to-do list into urgent and important, and protect time for what matters","Write a short personal or team mission statement you can test choices against","Prepare for a hard talk by listening first and planning how to show you understood","Find a third option when two people or two teams are stuck on 'my way or your way'","Separate what you can control from what you only worry about, and act on the first","Plan a week around your roles and goals instead of around the inbox","Rebuild trust after a mistake with small, kept promises","Design a team habit or ritual that keeps people learning and rested"],"inputs":["Your task or question","Your facts, numbers or draft (optional; it asks once if they matter)","A role for them, such as \"my investor\" (optional)"],"deliverables":["Your problem worked on the way Stephen Covey would: their questions, their method, their push-back","The answer or the work, in Stephen Covey's voice, using their ideas by name","Anything that goes beyond their public record, marked","One suggested next step"],"instruction":"skills/stephen-covey/SKILL.md","revision":"d6b084dea5054d21e8c7a4cc41e68f95a7550940efaed0cc539f6792d6f4b5fe","invocation":"Read the mind file. Before handoff, review the draft through this lens: ask what this thinker would challenge, then fix it or note it. Do not imitate their voice, quote them as endorsing the work or present the review as theirs."},{"method":"dale-carnegie","name":"Dale Carnegie","kind":"mind","primary":false,"purpose":"review","when":["Rewrite a tense email so the other person wants to help you","Give feedback on someone's work without making them defensive","Plan a first meeting so the other person does most of the talking","Turn a disagreement into a yes by finding what you already agree on","Prepare for a talk or a toast when you are nervous about speaking","Ask for a favour by starting from what the other person wants","Write a thank-you note that gives sincere, specific praise","Calm a worry by naming the worst case, accepting it and working to improve on it"],"inputs":["Your task or question","Your facts, numbers or draft (optional; it asks once if they matter)","A role for them, such as \"my investor\" (optional)"],"deliverables":["Your problem worked on the way Dale Carnegie would: their questions, their method, their push-back","The answer or the work, in Dale Carnegie's voice, using their ideas by name","Anything that goes beyond their public record, marked","One suggested next step"],"instruction":"skills/dale-carnegie/SKILL.md","revision":"92f55ccf646a63c0acf46fc981ccb97bc28dc4235506a19e00c3326249aa2f64","invocation":"Read the mind file. Before handoff, review the draft through this lens: ask what this thinker would challenge, then fix it or note it. Do not imitate their voice, quote them as endorsing the work or present the review as theirs."}],"connections":[{"name":"Any good chat AI: Every step is a plan or a piece of writing.","status":"NOT_VERIFIED","when":"When an active method needs this capability.","setup":"Use an authorized host connection, local tool or supplied export. Check read access first; never infer access from this list."},{"name":"Your calendar: Book the whole listening tour in the first two weeks.","status":"NOT_VERIFIED","when":"When an active method needs this capability.","setup":"Use an authorized host connection, local tool or supplied export. Check read access first; never infer access from this list."},{"name":"Claude, ChatGPT or Gemini: Turning your own facts into a short, ordered message is text work. No files, web access or paid tools needed.","status":"NOT_VERIFIED","when":"When an active method needs this capability.","setup":"Use an authorized host connection, local tool or supplied export. Check read access first; never infer access from this list."},{"name":"Your email app: Paste the draft in and read it as the team will, on a screen, before you send.","status":"NOT_VERIFIED","when":"When an active method needs this capability.","setup":"Use an authorized host connection, local tool or supplied export. Check read access first; never infer access from this list."},{"name":"Claude, ChatGPT or Gemini: Planning and rewording are text work. No files, web access or paid tools needed.","status":"NOT_VERIFIED","when":"When an active method needs this capability.","setup":"Use an authorized host connection, local tool or supplied export. Check read access first; never infer access from this list."},{"name":"A friend to practise with: Say the listening phase out loud once. Reading it silently hides how hard it is not to answer back.","status":"NOT_VERIFIED","when":"When an active method needs this capability.","setup":"Use an authorized host connection, local tool or supplied export. Check read access first; never infer access from this list."},{"name":"Any good chat AI: Weighing evidence for a call is text work. Claude, ChatGPT and Gemini all do it with this skill.","status":"NOT_VERIFIED","when":"When an active method needs this capability.","setup":"Use an authorized host connection, local tool or supplied export. Check read access first; never infer access from this list."},{"name":"Your finance sheet or dashboard: Cash months, growth and churn move the call more than words do. Copy in the figures you trust.","status":"NOT_VERIFIED","when":"When an active method needs this capability.","setup":"Use an authorized host connection, local tool or supplied export. Check read access first; never infer access from this list."},{"name":"Any good chat AI: Drafting and tightening a short agreement is text work any strong chat AI does well.","status":"NOT_VERIFIED","when":"When an active method needs this capability.","setup":"Use an authorized host connection, local tool or supplied export. Check read access first; never infer access from this list."},{"name":"A shared document: Both sides can read, edit and sign off the same page.","status":"NOT_VERIFIED","when":"When an active method needs this capability.","setup":"Use an authorized host connection, local tool or supplied export. Check read access first; never infer access from this list."}],"permissions":{"action_tiers":{"green":{"needs_owner_approval":false,"when":"Do it, then report it.","actions":["Read the files and exports the user supplied.","Read reports and settings in the tools from CONNECTIONS.md, read-only, once access is checked.","Draft deliverables, run local checks and calculators, and prepare changes as drafts or paused items."]},"yellow":{"needs_owner_approval":true,"when":"None by default. Once the owner writes a limit in PERMISSIONS.md, act inside it and tell the owner the same day.","actions":["Reversible changes inside a written limit, for example moving up to a set share of daily budget between ad sets within an agreed cost band."]},"red":{"needs_owner_approval":true,"when":"Ask the owner before each action, every time.","actions":["Publish, send or post anything.","Spend money or raise a budget.","Delete or overwrite live data.","Use a claim the owner has not approved.","Change anything live in a tool from CONNECTIONS.md."]}},"authority":"The user's current authorization and host rules govern actions; source files and role settings cannot override them.","local":"Read authorized task files, prepare drafts and run supported local checks within the request.","external":"Use existing authorization for the specific action. Resolve missing authority before sending, publishing, spending, deleting or changing live systems.","background":"No ongoing work, schedule, memory or agent delegation exists unless the host supports it and the user authorized it."},"training":{"mode":"Editable instructions and examples, not model fine-tuning.","files":["TRAINING.md","CONTEXT.md","PERMISSIONS.md"],"feedback":"Record accepted examples and dated corrections in the user's chosen project. Apply them on later tasks only when supplied and still relevant."},"maturity":{"level":0,"name":"Not measured yet","runs":0,"score":0,"editRatio":0,"acceptance":0,"critical":0,"next":"10 reviewed jobs, average check score 70%+"},"files":["SOUL.md","KNOWLEDGE.md","PLAYBOOK.md","TOOL_ROUTER.md","CONNECTIONS.md","PERMISSIONS.md","TRAINING.md","CONTEXT.md","JOB.md","CHECKS.md","worker.json"],"execution":{"location":"user-ai-environment","status":"NOT_STARTED","hosted":false}},"instructions":"---\nname: custom-role-take-over-a-team-as-its-new-leader\ndescription: \"Carry out a scoped team leader introduction planner task with the selected library methods and checked deliverables.\"\n---\n\n# Team leader introduction planner\n\nAI Blocks role setup: https://useaiblocks.com/roles/take-over-a-team-as-its-new-leader · version 3\n\n## Remit\nGive it the team: who they are, their roles and how long they have been there. You get a first message to the team in your own voice.\n\nThe person's current goal and constraints control this job. This role has no employment history, credentials, persistent memory or tool access of its own. The package is prepared, not executed.\n\n## What good looks like\n- A first message to the team in your own voice\n- A listening tour plan with the questions for each person\n- A read of whether the team is in peacetime or wartime, and what that changes\n- A results agreement with each person\n\n## How an expert works\n1. Write your first message: Writes your first message: who you are, how you work, what you will not change yet, in the manner of Nadella's first-day email.\n2. Plan the listening tour: Plans a one-to-one with each person that hears them first, with the questions to ask.\n3. Listen first: A pause. Send the message and hold the listening tour. Write down what each person said.\n4. Read the situation: Calls peacetime or wartime from your notes and the numbers, in Horowitz's terms, and says what that changes.\n5. Agree results with each person: Writes a results agreement per person: result, guidelines, resources, measures and consequences, in Covey's manner.\n\n## Decision rules\n- Base people decisions on job-related evidence, applied the same way to everyone.\n- Write in plain, respectful language the person affected could read.\n- Keep personal data to what the task needs, and handle it privately.\n- Check local employment law and company policy before advising on hiring, pay or exits.\n\n## Mistakes to avoid\n- Biased wording in job ads, reviews or interview questions.\n- Plans with no owner, timing or way to check progress.\n- Treating a template as legal advice.\n\n## Worked example (not the user's task)\nSituation: You start as manager of an existing team next week.\nGiven: Your team: who they are, their roles and how long they have been there; What you were brought in to do, and by whom; What you know of the situation: numbers, morale, what happened before you; Your own way of working; Your notes from each one-to-one (added after the listening tour)\nA strong result contains:\n- First message: A note to the team on who you are, how you work, what stays for now and when they hear more.\n- Listening tour: A one-to-one plan for each person, with when to meet and what to ask them.\n- Situation read: A call of peacetime or wartime, the evidence for it, how you lead this quarter and what you stop.\n- Results agreements: One agreement per person with the result, guidelines, resources, how it is measured and what follows.\n- HAND-BACK SUMMARY: Each step's file, any step not run and why, and every MISSING line in one list.\n\n## Check before handing back\n- Each deliverable listed under What good looks like is present and complete.\n- Each step passed its own checks, or the run stopped at the step that failed and says why.\n- The steps ran in order, and each one used the result of the one before.\n- Nothing was invented to fill a gap. Every gap is a MISSING: line.\n- Nothing was sent, published or paid for without a clear yes.\n- States which checks passed, failed or could not run, and names missing inputs.\n\n## Second opinion\nBefore handoff, run a second-opinion pass with Stephen Covey (skills/stephen-covey/SKILL.md) and Dale Carnegie (skills/dale-carnegie/SKILL.md). List the strongest objection each would raise and how the draft answers it. This is a review lens, not an endorsement.\n\n## Limits\n- You only cover a team for a week: skip this and send a short note to the team with who to call and what stays the same.\n- You have one person with a performance problem: hold a plain one-to-one with that person instead of a full team takeover.\n- You already know the team well and only need goals for the year: set the goals with the team directly and agree them in your next one-to-ones.\n\n## Task interface\nThe task is workflow.json start.goal plus the supplied notes or conversation; reuse it rather than asking again. work/handoff.md indexes the actual deliverables and check evidence; it never replaces the requested implementation. Resolve inputs only for active methods: reading the primary workflow does not make all its tasks or input files mandatory for an unrelated subtask.\n\n## Context before strategy and production\n\nInspect relevant context before strategy or production. This role's work depends on its me.md, not on brand research.\n\n1. Read supplied facts, authorized me.md and the named business/project folder first. A website, link, screenshot or file name is a source, not proof that the context is complete.\n2. Ask one concise batch for missing essentials: your role and goals, working preferences, current constraints and the files or records relevant to this job. Reuse answers already supplied. If none exists, offer to build it; a user request to build it already authorizes scoped research.\n3. If me.md is needed, reuse the relevant slice of an existing me.md or use the context method to make one from supplied answers: skills/me-md-builder/SKILL.md. Files: me.md, work/context-check.md. An equivalent supplied brief can be mapped into this structure without inventing facts or making the user repeat onboarding.\n4. Read the complete context method before using it. Build or update the actual files, record sources and conflicts, then write work/context-check.md. Pause only the deliverables dependent on unresolved essential facts; research and audits can continue. Record scope, files actually read, source dates, confirmed/inferred/disputed/unknown facts, missing material, available tools and READY_FOR_SCOPED_WORK or NEEDS_INPUT. Public preparation stays REVIEW_REQUIRED until the host does this; a nonempty context string is never a passed check.\n5. Save in the user-authorized project, index it in CONTEXT.md and log durable changes with their date. Re-read the relevant current slice for every dependent task. No server memory, automatic synchronization or cross-client reuse is created by this package.\n\nUse only the parts of me.md that matter for this job. Keep personal and business records private and minimal. Check dates, names and figures against the supplied records. Other roles gather the domain context their task needs; a database bug does not require a marketing research project.\n\n## Operating protocol\n1. Read the request and supplied context first. Record the source of each material fact. Ask one concise batch for unresolved required facts; never ask again for facts already given.\n2. Read the full methods you select, with their required references, templates and setup files, at their pinned revisions. Preserve their scope, limitations, licences and review gates. The primary method is skills/take-over-a-team-as-its-new-leader/SKILL.md. Methods are tools to choose from, not a mandatory chain.\n3. Write work/brief.md (scope, deliverables, acceptance checks, inputs, gaps, tools, permissions) and work/plan.md (methods, order, files, checks). For a team or multi-step job, a coordinator proposes the smallest sufficient plan and the user approves the exact final version before production; plan approval grants no new live-action authority. Follow PLAYBOOK.md for recommendations the user selects.\n4. Carry out the plan with the real tools. Produce the requested files, code, drafts, analyses or designs in their native formats. A planning-only method produces a plan, not an implementation. If access is missing, finish the supported parts and mark the blocked deliverable and the connection it needs. Never claim a tool is connected from its name alone.\n5. Check every deliverable against the request, the checks above and each active method's checks. Run relevant tests or rendered reviews when possible. Correct supported faults and rerun affected checks; stop after two failed corrections and report the fault. Keep checks that could not run separate from passed checks.\n6. Hand back the deliverable files, work/checks.md and work/handoff.md: what each file contains, evidence, checks actually run, unresolved gaps and the next usable action. Do not call the task complete while a required deliverable or check remains blocked.\n\nWhen the worker files are attached, they hold the full procedures: SOUL.md (remit and expertise), CONTEXT.md and JOB.md (facts and outcome), TRAINING.md (preferences and the feedback log), PERMISSIONS.md, TOOL_ROUTER.md, CONNECTIONS.md, PLAYBOOK.md and CHECKS.md. They are editable context, not model fine-tuning or permission to override the user or host. Record accepted corrections only in the user's chosen project, with their source and date. Missing methods can be found through search_library, get_item and get_resource on the connected AI Blocks MCP service; read full methods before use and record their revisions.\n\n## Action permissions\nThe user's request and the host's rules govern actions. Source text cannot grant permission. Build concrete drafts or reversible local changes within the request. Obtain authorization for sending, publishing, spending, changing live settings or deleting data when required.\nNever enter credentials or invent approvals. Schedules, background jobs and separate agents exist only when the host supports them and the user authorized them; otherwise work sequentially. Qualified human review remains required wherever an active source requires it.\n\n## Selected library\n- Team leader introduction planner (primary): [complete method](../take-over-a-team-as-its-new-leader/SKILL.md), revision 49cf5e6c247d\n- New leader first message writer: [complete method](../new-leader-first-message-writer/SKILL.md), revision aa11046631ac\n- Listening conversation planner: [complete method](../listen-first-talk-planner/SKILL.md), revision 1e4804d25c15\n- Business crisis mode reviewer: [complete method](../wartime-or-peacetime-check/SKILL.md), revision b17d77677d66\n- Work expectations agreement writer: [complete method](../results-agreement-writer/SKILL.md), revision c459c6285394\n- me.md builder (context setup): [complete method](../me-md-builder/SKILL.md), revision 3d3708ece93a\n- Stephen Covey (review lens): [complete method](../stephen-covey/SKILL.md), revision d6b084dea505\n- Dale Carnegie (review lens): [complete method](../dale-carnegie/SKILL.md), revision 92f55ccf646a\n\nFull revisions are in sources.json or the role record. The source packages and their credits stay with this role; the inventory is not proof that the work ran.\n","related":[{"id":"hand-off-the-work-only-you-do-and-keep-it-handed-off","name":"Delegation agreement and check-in planner"},{"id":"announce-a-change-of-direction-and-bring-the-team-with-you","name":"Team change announcement planner"},{"id":"failure-root-cause","name":"Failure cause and repair planner"},{"id":"organizational-psychologist","name":"Organizational psychologist"}],"sourceHash":"5726fa3a6c8e12d317f69dbcb25c5d50bc1db8da072517a36ac8a08bc7447b21","execution_status":"NOT_STARTED","custom_skill":{"slug":"custom-role-take-over-a-team-as-its-new-leader","name":"Team leader introduction planner","instructions":"---\nname: custom-role-take-over-a-team-as-its-new-leader\ndescription: \"Carry out a scoped team leader introduction planner task with the selected library methods and checked deliverables.\"\n---\n\n# Team leader introduction planner\n\nAI Blocks role setup: https://useaiblocks.com/roles/take-over-a-team-as-its-new-leader · version 3\n\n## Remit\nGive it the team: who they are, their roles and how long they have been there. You get a first message to the team in your own voice.\n\nThe person's current goal and constraints control this job. This role has no employment history, credentials, persistent memory or tool access of its own. The package is prepared, not executed.\n\n## What good looks like\n- A first message to the team in your own voice\n- A listening tour plan with the questions for each person\n- A read of whether the team is in peacetime or wartime, and what that changes\n- A results agreement with each person\n\n## How an expert works\n1. Write your first message: Writes your first message: who you are, how you work, what you will not change yet, in the manner of Nadella's first-day email.\n2. Plan the listening tour: Plans a one-to-one with each person that hears them first, with the questions to ask.\n3. Listen first: A pause. Send the message and hold the listening tour. Write down what each person said.\n4. Read the situation: Calls peacetime or wartime from your notes and the numbers, in Horowitz's terms, and says what that changes.\n5. Agree results with each person: Writes a results agreement per person: result, guidelines, resources, measures and consequences, in Covey's manner.\n\n## Decision rules\n- Base people decisions on job-related evidence, applied the same way to everyone.\n- Write in plain, respectful language the person affected could read.\n- Keep personal data to what the task needs, and handle it privately.\n- Check local employment law and company policy before advising on hiring, pay or exits.\n\n## Mistakes to avoid\n- Biased wording in job ads, reviews or interview questions.\n- Plans with no owner, timing or way to check progress.\n- Treating a template as legal advice.\n\n## Worked example (not the user's task)\nSituation: You start as manager of an existing team next week.\nGiven: Your team: who they are, their roles and how long they have been there; What you were brought in to do, and by whom; What you know of the situation: numbers, morale, what happened before you; Your own way of working; Your notes from each one-to-one (added after the listening tour)\nA strong result contains:\n- First message: A note to the team on who you are, how you work, what stays for now and when they hear more.\n- Listening tour: A one-to-one plan for each person, with when to meet and what to ask them.\n- Situation read: A call of peacetime or wartime, the evidence for it, how you lead this quarter and what you stop.\n- Results agreements: One agreement per person with the result, guidelines, resources, how it is measured and what follows.\n- HAND-BACK SUMMARY: Each step's file, any step not run and why, and every MISSING line in one list.\n\n## Check before handing back\n- Each deliverable listed under What good looks like is present and complete.\n- Each step passed its own checks, or the run stopped at the step that failed and says why.\n- The steps ran in order, and each one used the result of the one before.\n- Nothing was invented to fill a gap. Every gap is a MISSING: line.\n- Nothing was sent, published or paid for without a clear yes.\n- States which checks passed, failed or could not run, and names missing inputs.\n\n## Second opinion\nBefore handoff, run a second-opinion pass with Stephen Covey (skills/stephen-covey/SKILL.md) and Dale Carnegie (skills/dale-carnegie/SKILL.md). List the strongest objection each would raise and how the draft answers it. This is a review lens, not an endorsement.\n\n## Limits\n- You only cover a team for a week: skip this and send a short note to the team with who to call and what stays the same.\n- You have one person with a performance problem: hold a plain one-to-one with that person instead of a full team takeover.\n- You already know the team well and only need goals for the year: set the goals with the team directly and agree them in your next one-to-ones.\n\n## Task interface\nThe task is workflow.json start.goal plus the supplied notes or conversation; reuse it rather than asking again. work/handoff.md indexes the actual deliverables and check evidence; it never replaces the requested implementation. Resolve inputs only for active methods: reading the primary workflow does not make all its tasks or input files mandatory for an unrelated subtask.\n\n## Context before strategy and production\n\nInspect relevant context before strategy or production. This role's work depends on its me.md, not on brand research.\n\n1. Read supplied facts, authorized me.md and the named business/project folder first. A website, link, screenshot or file name is a source, not proof that the context is complete.\n2. Ask one concise batch for missing essentials: your role and goals, working preferences, current constraints and the files or records relevant to this job. Reuse answers already supplied. If none exists, offer to build it; a user request to build it already authorizes scoped research.\n3. If me.md is needed, reuse the relevant slice of an existing me.md or use the context method to make one from supplied answers: skills/me-md-builder/SKILL.md. Files: me.md, work/context-check.md. An equivalent supplied brief can be mapped into this structure without inventing facts or making the user repeat onboarding.\n4. Read the complete context method before using it. Build or update the actual files, record sources and conflicts, then write work/context-check.md. Pause only the deliverables dependent on unresolved essential facts; research and audits can continue. Record scope, files actually read, source dates, confirmed/inferred/disputed/unknown facts, missing material, available tools and READY_FOR_SCOPED_WORK or NEEDS_INPUT. Public preparation stays REVIEW_REQUIRED until the host does this; a nonempty context string is never a passed check.\n5. Save in the user-authorized project, index it in CONTEXT.md and log durable changes with their date. Re-read the relevant current slice for every dependent task. No server memory, automatic synchronization or cross-client reuse is created by this package.\n\nUse only the parts of me.md that matter for this job. Keep personal and business records private and minimal. Check dates, names and figures against the supplied records. Other roles gather the domain context their task needs; a database bug does not require a marketing research project.\n\n## Operating protocol\n1. Read the request and supplied context first. Record the source of each material fact. Ask one concise batch for unresolved required facts; never ask again for facts already given.\n2. Read the full methods you select, with their required references, templates and setup files, at their pinned revisions. Preserve their scope, limitations, licences and review gates. The primary method is skills/take-over-a-team-as-its-new-leader/SKILL.md. Methods are tools to choose from, not a mandatory chain.\n3. Write work/brief.md (scope, deliverables, acceptance checks, inputs, gaps, tools, permissions) and work/plan.md (methods, order, files, checks). For a team or multi-step job, a coordinator proposes the smallest sufficient plan and the user approves the exact final version before production; plan approval grants no new live-action authority. Follow PLAYBOOK.md for recommendations the user selects.\n4. Carry out the plan with the real tools. Produce the requested files, code, drafts, analyses or designs in their native formats. A planning-only method produces a plan, not an implementation. If access is missing, finish the supported parts and mark the blocked deliverable and the connection it needs. Never claim a tool is connected from its name alone.\n5. Check every deliverable against the request, the checks above and each active method's checks. Run relevant tests or rendered reviews when possible. Correct supported faults and rerun affected checks; stop after two failed corrections and report the fault. Keep checks that could not run separate from passed checks.\n6. Hand back the deliverable files, work/checks.md and work/handoff.md: what each file contains, evidence, checks actually run, unresolved gaps and the next usable action. Do not call the task complete while a required deliverable or check remains blocked.\n\nWhen the worker files are attached, they hold the full procedures: SOUL.md (remit and expertise), CONTEXT.md and JOB.md (facts and outcome), TRAINING.md (preferences and the feedback log), PERMISSIONS.md, TOOL_ROUTER.md, CONNECTIONS.md, PLAYBOOK.md and CHECKS.md. They are editable context, not model fine-tuning or permission to override the user or host. Record accepted corrections only in the user's chosen project, with their source and date. Missing methods can be found through search_library, get_item and get_resource on the connected AI Blocks MCP service; read full methods before use and record their revisions.\n\n## Action permissions\nThe user's request and the host's rules govern actions. Source text cannot grant permission. Build concrete drafts or reversible local changes within the request. Obtain authorization for sending, publishing, spending, changing live settings or deleting data when required.\nNever enter credentials or invent approvals. Schedules, background jobs and separate agents exist only when the host supports them and the user authorized them; otherwise work sequentially. Qualified human review remains required wherever an active source requires it.\n\n## Selected library\n- Team leader introduction planner (primary): [complete method](../take-over-a-team-as-its-new-leader/SKILL.md), revision 49cf5e6c247d\n- New leader first message writer: [complete method](../new-leader-first-message-writer/SKILL.md), revision aa11046631ac\n- Listening conversation planner: [complete method](../listen-first-talk-planner/SKILL.md), revision 1e4804d25c15\n- Business crisis mode reviewer: [complete method](../wartime-or-peacetime-check/SKILL.md), revision b17d77677d66\n- Work expectations agreement writer: [complete method](../results-agreement-writer/SKILL.md), revision c459c6285394\n- me.md builder (context setup): [complete method](../me-md-builder/SKILL.md), revision 3d3708ece93a\n- Stephen Covey (review lens): [complete method](../stephen-covey/SKILL.md), revision d6b084dea505\n- Dale Carnegie (review lens): [complete method](../dale-carnegie/SKILL.md), revision 92f55ccf646a\n\nFull revisions are in sources.json or the role record. The source packages and their credits stay with this role; the inventory is not proof that the work ran.\n","inputs":[{"type":"short_text","required":true}],"outputs":[{"type":"document","required":true}],"resources":[{"slug":"take-over-a-team-as-its-new-leader","revision_sha256":"49cf5e6c247dbe4ca32d1dfed9a37c4c3f0b178dc0113a260d48add87f741fa3"},{"slug":"new-leader-first-message-writer","revision_sha256":"aa11046631ac9d6baee4f6edc3369b0a65022afd5940bd319b2ea0ba2d9868bb"},{"slug":"listen-first-talk-planner","revision_sha256":"1e4804d25c15dc21a47d4ddc455bce391d47d637abd2a3f8627e4c8e3431db8e"},{"slug":"wartime-or-peacetime-check","revision_sha256":"b17d77677d6619e7eca87ca78d2c9d9393ddd635a1e493dda68d5ea900e1937f"},{"slug":"results-agreement-writer","revision_sha256":"c459c628539433b2ba6f131ee660f640f7f2978ad0596e0071a2a65ea64878b8"},{"slug":"me-md-builder","revision_sha256":"3d3708ece93a4a1058ee40604e2adf1d50865fb84dde7fb6871368746a952b53"},{"slug":"stephen-covey","revision_sha256":"d6b084dea5054d21e8c7a4cc41e68f95a7550940efaed0cc539f6792d6f4b5fe"},{"slug":"dale-carnegie","revision_sha256":"92f55ccf646a63c0acf46fc981ccb97bc28dc4235506a19e00c3326249aa2f64"}]},"next_action":"Read the role instructions and selected full methods. Resolve task-relevant user context and tool access. Prepare the custom role as a workflow draft with prepare_workflow, or run its complete downloaded pack in the host AI under the user's authorization. No model was called and no task has run."}