{"schema":"ai-blocks-role/1","id":"plan-a-peer-feedback-session-that-helps","name":"Peer writing feedback and revision planner","summary":"Share writing drafts, criteria, group size and session time. Get a peer-review guide, example feedback and a record for real revision choices.","area":"people","family":{"id":"teach-and-train","name":"Teach and train people"},"lead":"plan-a-peer-feedback-session-that-helps","featured":false,"contextKind":"personal","deliverables":["A session plan with roles, speaking order, timings and ground rules","A note form that asks what does not work and where","A model of honest feedback on one permitted draft","A revision record with columns for the comment, the writer's decision and the reason","Real comments sorted into fixes, split opinions and facts to check (only when you bring comments)","A summary of what was not run and one next step"],"inputs":["The drafts to be reviewed, such as stories, scripts or other creative writing","The task or criteria reviewers should use","Who the reviewers are and the group size","Your session time, and whether it runs in a room or online","One draft whose author agrees to it being used as the model example","Real comments, if the session has already happened (optional)","How much feedback practice the group has had (optional)"],"opening":{"give":["The drafts to be reviewed, such as stories, scripts or other creative writing","The task or criteria reviewers should use","Who the reviewers are and the group size"],"get":["A session plan with roles, speaking order, timings and ground rules","A note form that asks what does not work and where","A model of honest feedback on one permitted draft","Real comments sorted into fixes, split opinions and facts to check (only when you bring comments)"]},"helpfulInputs":["The real comments, typed up with a label for each reviewer.","A note on who counts as the reader the writer is aiming at."],"fit":["Your class or writing group is about to swap drafts and last time the comments were vague.","You run a workshop and need a session that fits your time slot and group size.","A writer has comments from several readers and wants them sorted into what to fix first.","You want reviewers to practise feedback before it counts for anything."],"limits":["You need grades or marks. Peer comments are not marking. Use the Marking rubric writer or the Student rubric feedback writer.","No peers are available. Get feedback on one draft from the Long-form draft reviewer.","You already have comments and only want them sorted. Use the Reader feedback sorter.","You need to give one person hard feedback face to face. Use the Evidence-based feedback conversation planner workflow."],"tools":["Claude, ChatGPT or Gemini with file support: They can read drafts as pasted text or files. None of them can run the session for you.","Any good chat AI: Turning a project and a list of people into a plan is text work any strong chat AI does well.","A shared document: Reviewers write problem notes in one place the owner can read afterwards.","Any good chat AI: Planning, questioning and structuring are text work any strong chat AI does well with this skill.","Any good chat AI: Sorting and counting notes is text work any strong chat AI does well.","A shared document: Comments in the draft are easier to tie to places than a loose email."],"method":["Download the handoff pack. It is a zip with HANDOFF.md and every skill file this workflow uses.","Give the folder to Claude, ChatGPT or Gemini and say \"Follow HANDOFF.md\".","Paste the drafts or their descriptions, the criteria, the group and the time. Say whether the session has happened yet.","Ask the author of the example draft first. The model feedback uses that draft only.","Print the note form and the plan. After the session, come back with the comments to sort them."],"capabilities":[{"name":"Peer feedback session planner","description":"Picks reviewers, sets the time for each part, writes the rules and builds the note form. It hands the criteria and the form to the model step."},{"name":"Honest draft feedback giver","description":"Takes the one permitted draft you give it, not the plan, and uses the criteria from step 1. It writes feedback on that draft, naming what works, what to leave alone and which lines to question. It hands that example to the record."},{"name":"Reader feedback sorter","description":"Runs only when real comments exist. It sorts them into fixes, split opinions and facts to check, then ranks a rewrite list. Before that, it is marked not run."}],"expertise":{"principles":["Base people decisions on job-related evidence, applied the same way to everyone.","Write in plain, respectful language the person affected could read.","Keep personal data to what the task needs, and handle it privately.","Check local employment law and company policy before advising on hiring, pay or exits."],"pitfalls":["Biased wording in job ads, reviews or interview questions.","Plans with no owner, timing or way to check progress.","Treating a template as legal advice."],"quality":["The model feedback uses only the permitted draft.","Step 3 ran only on real comments, and no comment was invented.","Every rule and timing in the plan fits the time given, or the overrun is stated.","The record leaves decisions to the writers.","No grade or mark appears anywhere in the files.","Criteria are written down before people are assessed.","Every plan has milestones and owners."],"sources":{"learned":0,"curated":false,"method":5,"source":0,"area":"people"}},"workedExample":{"situation":"Your class or writing group is about to swap drafts and last time the comments were vague.","task":"Share writing drafts, criteria, group size and session time. Use the material I attach and ask for anything essential that is missing.","given":["The drafts, or a short description of each","The task criteria reviewers should use","Who the reviewers are, the group size and your time","Real comments from the session (optional)"],"outputs":[{"name":"Session plan","contains":"Who reviews whom, the order, minutes for each part and the ground rules."},{"name":"Note form","contains":"A blank form where reviewers write what does not work and where."},{"name":"Model feedback","contains":"Honest feedback on one permitted draft, showing what reviewers should aim for."},{"name":"Revision record","contains":"Rows for each comment with the writer's decision and the reason."},{"name":"Sorted comments","contains":"Real comments grouped into fixes, split opinions and facts to check. Left blank without comments."},{"name":"Hand-back summary","contains":"Files saved, steps not run, facts missing and one next step."}]},"example":"Share writing drafts, criteria, group size and session time. Use the material I attach and ask for anything essential that is missing.","functions":[{"name":"Peer writing feedback and revision planner","description":"Share writing drafts, criteria, group size and session time. Get a peer-review guide, example feedback and a record for real revision choices.","method":"plan-a-peer-feedback-session-that-helps","when":["Your class or writing group is about to swap drafts and last time the comments were vague.","You run a workshop and need a session that fits your time slot and group size.","A writer has comments from several readers and wants them sorted into what to fix first.","You want reviewers to practise feedback before it counts for anything."],"inputs":["The drafts to be reviewed, such as stories, scripts or other creative writing","The task or criteria reviewers should use","Who the reviewers are and the group size","Your session time, and whether it runs in a room or online","One draft whose author agrees to it being used as the model example","Real comments, if the session has already happened (optional)","How much feedback practice the group has had (optional)"],"deliverables":["A session plan with roles, speaking order, timings and ground rules","A note form that asks what does not work and where","A model of honest feedback on one permitted draft","A revision record with columns for the comment, the writer's decision and the reason","Real comments sorted into fixes, split opinions and facts to check (only when you bring comments)","A summary of what was not run and one next step"]},{"name":"Peer feedback session planner","description":"Plan a peer feedback session for a stuck project. Get the reviewers, timings and note rules that help people say what is not working.","method":"peer-feedback-session-planner","when":["A project has stalled and the team keeps showing only polished updates.","You want a review where people say what they really think without fear.","You manage a creative or complex team and need a repeatable way to get notes."],"inputs":["The stuck project and what stage it is at","The people who could review, with their role and what they have done before","A rough draft or description of the work (optional)","Your time limit and where the session will happen"],"deliverables":["A list of reviewers chosen, with anyone left out and the reason for each","The session plan, with rules, timings and who speaks when","A form for notes that records problems, not fixes","A follow-up date and the question to ask then"]},{"name":"Long-form draft reviewer","description":"Share a full draft, its purpose and what matters to you. Get specific notes on strong lines, weak spots and choices to reconsider.","method":"honest-draft-feedback-giver","when":["You wrote a script, page or story and want honest notes.","You are reviewing someone else's draft and want to be useful without taking over.","A draft feels flat and you cannot say why."],"inputs":["The draft, pasted whole","What it is for and who reads it","What you love in it, or what excited you (optional)","A brief, if there is one (optional)"],"deliverables":["A short note on what is working","Notes on specific weak lines, each as a question","Where the reader leans in and where they drift","A leave-alone list and a check of each action against the character"]},{"name":"Reader feedback sorter","description":"Sort feedback from several readers into what to fix, what to leave alone and a ranked rewrite list for your next draft.","method":"reader-feedback-sorter","when":["You have notes from several readers and they conflict.","You are not sure which comments to act on.","You want a clear list before the second draft."],"inputs":["Each reader's notes, labelled by reader","Which reader is your ideal reader","Your draft, or its scene list (optional)","Anything you already plan to change (optional)"],"deliverables":["All the notes in one list by place in the draft","A count of how many readers raised each point","Agreed problems, washes and fact catches, kept apart","A ranked rewrite list and questions to ask readers who were vague"]},{"name":"me.md builder","description":"Answer a few questions, or let your AI use what it remembers. Get one private file that tells any AI who you are.","method":"me-md-builder","when":["You keep explaining your job and projects at the start of every chat.","You use more than one AI and want them all to know the same things about you.","Your AI gives you answers that don't sound like you or don't fit your work."],"inputs":["A yes or no to using what your AI remembers about you","A CV, LinkedIn export, bio or old me.md (optional)","Short answers to the questions it asks, or \"skip\""],"deliverables":["One me.md file with up to ten dated sections","A list of facts taken from memory, for you to check","A short note of what it removed for privacy","The two next steps, to save it and set it up"]},{"name":"Ed Catmull","description":"Plan feedback or protect rough creative work using Ed Catmull’s recorded approach. Name the problem, keep the creator’s choice and find hidden issues.","method":"ed-catmull","when":["Set up a peer feedback group that gives honest notes without taking over the work","Protect an early, rough idea from being judged or killed too soon","Decide which person to back for a new project, before you judge the idea","Run a review of a project that didn't work, without blaming the person","Find the hidden problems in a team that looks healthy from the top","Balance the pressure to ship on time with the need to make the work good","Help a stuck writer or designer get unstuck with a three-idea pitch","Bring artists and engineers, or makers and managers, together as equals"],"inputs":["Your task or question","Your facts, numbers or draft (optional; it asks once if they matter)","A role for them, such as \"my investor\" (optional)"],"deliverables":["Your problem worked on the way Ed Catmull would: their questions, their method, their push-back","The answer or the work, in Ed Catmull's voice, using their ideas by name","Anything that goes beyond their public record, marked","One suggested next step"]},{"name":"Stephen King","description":"Plan or revise fiction using Stephen King’s recorded craft advice. Start with a situation, build ordinary characters and set a writing habit.","method":"stephen-king","when":["Turn a 'what if' question into the start of a story","Build a daily writing habit you can keep","Cut the adverbs and timid phrasing out of a draft","Write a scene that makes the reader afraid of what's behind the door","Make a character feel like someone the reader knows from down the street","Write dialogue that sounds the way people talk","Write a short talk about something that scared you and what you learned","Get unstuck on a draft by asking what the characters would really do next"],"inputs":["Your task or question","Your facts, numbers or draft (optional; it asks once if they matter)","A role for them, such as \"my investor\" (optional)"],"deliverables":["Your problem worked on the way Stephen King would: their questions, their method, their push-back","The answer or the work, in Stephen King's voice, using their ideas by name","Anything that goes beyond their public record, marked","One suggested next step"]}],"resources":[{"slug":"plan-a-peer-feedback-session-that-helps","name":"Peer writing feedback and revision planner","summary":"Share writing drafts, criteria, group size and session time. Get a peer-review guide, example feedback and a record for real revision choices.","task":"teach-and-train","kind":"workflow","path":"/workflows/plan-a-peer-feedback-session-that-helps","revision":"393fc1b26ab662d68730da9f046b37493b4442faf9a05735b25959cb872cf675","skillPath":"/skills/plan-a-peer-feedback-session-that-helps/SKILL.md","bundled":false,"onboarding":false},{"slug":"peer-feedback-session-planner","name":"Peer feedback session planner","summary":"Plan a peer feedback session for a stuck project. Get the reviewers, timings and note rules that help people say what is not working.","task":"lead-people","kind":"skill","path":"/skills/peer-feedback-session-planner","revision":"7d769c6bcad23f11b7bc4468de348d65f81b96f7c4308836bb7df0ecb487281d","skillPath":"/skills/peer-feedback-session-planner/SKILL.md","bundled":true,"onboarding":false},{"slug":"honest-draft-feedback-giver","name":"Long-form draft reviewer","summary":"Share a full draft, its purpose and what matters to you. Get specific notes on strong lines, weak spots and choices to reconsider.","task":"write-and-tell-stories","kind":"skill","path":"/skills/honest-draft-feedback-giver","revision":"ac4e1c794595a525f6a44e372a9ebba9bf6fa923b304e6a2bf65f8302d1f6641","skillPath":"/skills/honest-draft-feedback-giver/SKILL.md","bundled":true,"onboarding":false},{"slug":"reader-feedback-sorter","name":"Reader feedback sorter","summary":"Sort feedback from several readers into what to fix, what to leave alone and a ranked rewrite list for your next draft.","task":"write-and-tell-stories","kind":"skill","path":"/skills/reader-feedback-sorter","revision":"4a88a198ded59a74521a54db6c5fcf88459ccf5ac5a0418e1df5a5c5c0ca2214","skillPath":"/skills/reader-feedback-sorter/SKILL.md","bundled":true,"onboarding":false},{"slug":"me-md-builder","name":"me.md builder","summary":"Answer a few questions, or let your AI use what it remembers. Get one private file that tells any AI who you are.","task":"set-up-ai","kind":"skill","path":"/skills/me-md-builder","revision":"3d3708ece93a4a1058ee40604e2adf1d50865fb84dde7fb6871368746a952b53","skillPath":"/skills/me-md-builder/SKILL.md","bundled":false,"onboarding":true},{"slug":"ed-catmull","name":"Ed Catmull","summary":"Plan feedback or protect rough creative work using Ed Catmull’s recorded approach. Name the problem, keep the creator’s choice and find hidden issues.","task":"think-with-minds","kind":"mind","path":"/minds/ed-catmull","revision":"e91b46b541bbedfd040af37d310c85eb227e38bdf50d09fefd5e787c6c400a27","skillPath":"/skills/ed-catmull/SKILL.md","bundled":false,"onboarding":false,"reviewer":true},{"slug":"stephen-king","name":"Stephen King","summary":"Plan or revise fiction using Stephen King’s recorded craft advice. Start with a situation, build ordinary characters and set a writing habit.","task":"think-with-minds","kind":"mind","path":"/minds/stephen-king","revision":"e81925353f20b0b77c150410f52dd6f9bfdd33cea0fe1886a048bdc82370e6da","skillPath":"/skills/stephen-king/SKILL.md","bundled":false,"onboarding":false,"reviewer":true}],"resourceCount":7,"sourceChecks":{"completeMethods":7,"referenceValidation":"PASS"},"catalogueHash":"3c3567ac2dbda7b2ac0cfaa8c93d8da3818f66bdadd51f18d8ff9051d77fc8f3","evaluation":{"status":"NOT_RUN","rubric":[{"id":"c1","criterion":"Delivers: A session plan with roles, speaking order, timings and ground rules"},{"id":"c2","criterion":"Delivers: A note form that asks what does not work and where"},{"id":"c3","criterion":"Delivers: A model of honest feedback on one permitted draft"},{"id":"c4","criterion":"Delivers: A revision record with columns for the comment, the writer's decision and the reason"},{"id":"c5","criterion":"The model feedback uses only the permitted draft."},{"id":"c6","criterion":"Step 3 ran only on real comments, and no comment was invented."},{"id":"c7","criterion":"Every rule and timing in the plan fits the time given, or the overrun is stated."},{"id":"c8","criterion":"The record leaves decisions to the writers."},{"id":"c9","criterion":"States which checks passed, failed or could not run, and names missing inputs."}],"goldenTasks":[{"id":"g1","kind":"core","situation":"Your class or writing group is about to swap drafts and last time the comments were vague.","expect":["A session plan with roles, speaking order, timings and ground rules","A note form that asks what does not work and where","A model of honest feedback on one permitted draft"]},{"id":"g2","kind":"core","situation":"You run a workshop and need a session that fits your time slot and group size.","expect":["A session plan with roles, speaking order, timings and ground rules","A note form that asks what does not work and where","A model of honest feedback on one permitted draft"]},{"id":"g-missing","kind":"missing-input","situation":"The request leaves out: The drafts to be reviewed, such as stories, scripts or other creative writing","expect":["Names the missing input and asks for it, or finishes only the parts that do not depend on it."]}],"note":"These checks are defined but have not been run against a model yet."},"version":{"number":2,"since":"2026-11-03","changes":[{"version":2,"date":"2026-11-03","what":"Updated scope, deliverables or inputs. Source methods updated to new revisions."},{"version":1,"date":"2026-11-02","what":"First recorded version."}]},"learning":{"rules":[],"maturity":{"level":0,"name":"Not measured yet","runs":0,"score":0,"editRatio":0,"acceptance":0,"critical":0,"next":"10 reviewed jobs, average check score 70%+"}},"worker":{"schema":"ai-blocks-specialist-worker/1","id":"plan-a-peer-feedback-session-that-helps","name":"Peer writing feedback and revision planner","interface":{"inputs":[{"type":"short_text","required":true}],"outputs":[{"type":"document","required":true}],"brief":"The current task in the workflow goal and supplied context.","handoff":"work/handoff.md indexes the actual native deliverables and checks. An index does not replace a requested implementation."},"identity":{"remit":"Share writing drafts, criteria, group size and session time. Get a peer-review guide, example feedback and a record for real revision choices.","capabilities":[{"name":"Peer feedback session planner","description":"Picks reviewers, sets the time for each part, writes the rules and builds the note form. It hands the criteria and the form to the model step."},{"name":"Honest draft feedback giver","description":"Takes the one permitted draft you give it, not the plan, and uses the criteria from step 1. It writes feedback on that draft, naming what works, what to leave alone and which lines to question. It hands that example to the record."},{"name":"Reader feedback sorter","description":"Runs only when real comments exist. It sorts them into fixes, split opinions and facts to check, then ranks a rewrite list. Before that, it is marked not run."}],"limits":["You need grades or marks. Peer comments are not marking. Use the Marking rubric writer or the Student rubric feedback writer.","No peers are available. Get feedback on one draft from the Long-form draft reviewer.","You already have comments and only want them sorted. Use the Reader feedback sorter.","You need to give one person hard feedback face to face. Use the Evidence-based feedback conversation planner workflow."]},"intake":{"state":"REVIEW_REQUIRED","assessed_by":"execution-host","service_verified":false,"kind":"personal","requirement":"Inspect relevant context before strategy or production. This role's work depends on its me.md, not on brand research.","method":"me-md-builder","files":["me.md","work/context-check.md"],"discovery":"Read supplied facts, authorized me.md and the named business/project folder first. A website, link, screenshot or file name is a source, not proof that the context is complete.","missing":"Ask one concise batch for missing essentials: your role and goals, working preferences, current constraints and the files or records relevant to this job. Reuse answers already supplied. If none exists, offer to build it; a user request to build it already authorizes scoped research.","gate":"Read the complete context method before using it. Build or update the actual files, record sources and conflicts, then write work/context-check.md. Pause only the deliverables dependent on unresolved essential facts; research and audits can continue.","reuse":"Save in the user-authorized project, index it in CONTEXT.md and log durable changes with their date. Re-read the relevant current slice for every dependent task. No server memory, automatic synchronization or cross-client reuse is created by this package."},"learning":{"state":"HOST_SETUP_REQUIRED","automatic_persistence":false,"measured_improvement":false,"storage":"The user-authorized business/project memory home; never a public catalogue or an unrelated client.","index":"memory/INDEX.md","records":["memory/preferences.md","memory/corrections.md","memory/decisions.md","memory/checks.md"],"outcome_loop":"Baseline, hypothesis, chosen route, approved change, actual implementation receipt, agreed measurement window, observed result, confidence/limitations, user decision and next test. Preserve negative and inconclusive outcomes.","update":"Save explicit user corrections and accepted examples with source, date, business, task/role scope, previous/new value and supersedes link. Distinguish a one-off edit from a durable preference; ask only when that distinction matters and remains unclear.","retrieval":"Read the short index and only relevant current records. Keep each fact in one canonical home, deduplicate and link to full evidence. Supersede stale guidance without silently erasing its history.","limits":"Feedback cannot expand action authority, override host rules or change imported source methods. Verify new skills, links and knowledge before use; preserve source revisions and credits.","measurement":"Turn repeatable errors into concrete acceptance or regression checks. Compare dated results on comparable cases, track failures and regressions, and do not promise near-zero errors or improvement without measurements."},"coordination":{"state":"PLAN_REQUIRED","entry":"coordinator","approval":"Review the contextual team plan, including a single-worker plan when sufficient. Incorporate comments and obtain user approval of the exact final version before specialist production. A preparation is not an approved plan.","handoffs":"Name the actual producer artifacts, source revisions, required consumer inputs, acceptance checks and blocked dependencies. Verify the artifact content before advancing.","memory":"Save the reviewed plan, decisions, artifact/check receipts and resumable state in the authorized business project. Actual persistent storage must be verified."},"routes":[{"method":"plan-a-peer-feedback-session-that-helps","name":"Peer writing feedback and revision planner","kind":"workflow","primary":true,"purpose":"primary","when":["Your class or writing group is about to swap drafts and last time the comments were vague.","You run a workshop and need a session that fits your time slot and group size.","A writer has comments from several readers and wants them sorted into what to fix first.","You want reviewers to practise feedback before it counts for anything."],"inputs":["The drafts to be reviewed, such as stories, scripts or other creative writing","The task or criteria reviewers should use","Who the reviewers are and the group size","Your session time, and whether it runs in a room or online","One draft whose author agrees to it being used as the model example","Real comments, if the session has already happened (optional)","How much feedback practice the group has had (optional)"],"deliverables":["A session plan with roles, speaking order, timings and ground rules","A note form that asks what does not work and where","A model of honest feedback on one permitted draft","A revision record with columns for the comment, the writer's decision and the reason","Real comments sorted into fixes, split opinions and facts to check (only when you bring comments)","A summary of what was not run and one next step"],"instruction":"skills/plan-a-peer-feedback-session-that-helps/SKILL.md","revision":"393fc1b26ab662d68730da9f046b37493b4442faf9a05735b25959cb872cf675","invocation":"Read the complete procedure, required inputs, real step order and stop gates. Use it only when it covers the job."},{"method":"peer-feedback-session-planner","name":"Peer feedback session planner","kind":"skill","primary":false,"purpose":"bundled","when":["A project has stalled and the team keeps showing only polished updates.","You want a review where people say what they really think without fear.","You manage a creative or complex team and need a repeatable way to get notes."],"inputs":["The stuck project and what stage it is at","The people who could review, with their role and what they have done before","A rough draft or description of the work (optional)","Your time limit and where the session will happen"],"deliverables":["A list of reviewers chosen, with anyone left out and the reason for each","The session plan, with rules, timings and who speaks when","A form for notes that records problems, not fixes","A follow-up date and the question to ask then"],"instruction":"skills/peer-feedback-session-planner/SKILL.md","revision":"7d769c6bcad23f11b7bc4468de348d65f81b96f7c4308836bb7df0ecb487281d","invocation":"Read the complete skill and required references. Use it for the matching subtask, then check the stated deliverables."},{"method":"honest-draft-feedback-giver","name":"Long-form draft reviewer","kind":"skill","primary":false,"purpose":"bundled","when":["You wrote a script, page or story and want honest notes.","You are reviewing someone else's draft and want to be useful without taking over.","A draft feels flat and you cannot say why."],"inputs":["The draft, pasted whole","What it is for and who reads it","What you love in it, or what excited you (optional)","A brief, if there is one (optional)"],"deliverables":["A short note on what is working","Notes on specific weak lines, each as a question","Where the reader leans in and where they drift","A leave-alone list and a check of each action against the character"],"instruction":"skills/honest-draft-feedback-giver/SKILL.md","revision":"ac4e1c794595a525f6a44e372a9ebba9bf6fa923b304e6a2bf65f8302d1f6641","invocation":"Read the complete skill and required references. Use it for the matching subtask, then check the stated deliverables."},{"method":"reader-feedback-sorter","name":"Reader feedback sorter","kind":"skill","primary":false,"purpose":"bundled","when":["You have notes from several readers and they conflict.","You are not sure which comments to act on.","You want a clear list before the second draft."],"inputs":["Each reader's notes, labelled by reader","Which reader is your ideal reader","Your draft, or its scene list (optional)","Anything you already plan to change (optional)"],"deliverables":["All the notes in one list by place in the draft","A count of how many readers raised each point","Agreed problems, washes and fact catches, kept apart","A ranked rewrite list and questions to ask readers who were vague"],"instruction":"skills/reader-feedback-sorter/SKILL.md","revision":"4a88a198ded59a74521a54db6c5fcf88459ccf5ac5a0418e1df5a5c5c0ca2214","invocation":"Read the complete skill and required references. Use it for the matching subtask, then check the stated deliverables."},{"method":"me-md-builder","name":"me.md builder","kind":"skill","primary":false,"purpose":"context","when":["You keep explaining your job and projects at the start of every chat.","You use more than one AI and want them all to know the same things about you.","Your AI gives you answers that don't sound like you or don't fit your work."],"inputs":["A yes or no to using what your AI remembers about you","A CV, LinkedIn export, bio or old me.md (optional)","Short answers to the questions it asks, or \"skip\""],"deliverables":["One me.md file with up to ten dated sections","A list of facts taken from memory, for you to check","A short note of what it removed for privacy","The two next steps, to save it and set it up"],"instruction":"skills/me-md-builder/SKILL.md","revision":"3d3708ece93a4a1058ee40604e2adf1d50865fb84dde7fb6871368746a952b53","invocation":"Read the complete skill and required references. Use it for the matching subtask, then check the stated deliverables."},{"method":"ed-catmull","name":"Ed Catmull","kind":"mind","primary":false,"purpose":"review","when":["Set up a peer feedback group that gives honest notes without taking over the work","Protect an early, rough idea from being judged or killed too soon","Decide which person to back for a new project, before you judge the idea","Run a review of a project that didn't work, without blaming the person","Find the hidden problems in a team that looks healthy from the top","Balance the pressure to ship on time with the need to make the work good","Help a stuck writer or designer get unstuck with a three-idea pitch","Bring artists and engineers, or makers and managers, together as equals"],"inputs":["Your task or question","Your facts, numbers or draft (optional; it asks once if they matter)","A role for them, such as \"my investor\" (optional)"],"deliverables":["Your problem worked on the way Ed Catmull would: their questions, their method, their push-back","The answer or the work, in Ed Catmull's voice, using their ideas by name","Anything that goes beyond their public record, marked","One suggested next step"],"instruction":"skills/ed-catmull/SKILL.md","revision":"e91b46b541bbedfd040af37d310c85eb227e38bdf50d09fefd5e787c6c400a27","invocation":"Read the mind file. Before handoff, review the draft through this lens: ask what this thinker would challenge, then fix it or note it. Do not imitate their voice, quote them as endorsing the work or present the review as theirs."},{"method":"stephen-king","name":"Stephen King","kind":"mind","primary":false,"purpose":"review","when":["Turn a 'what if' question into the start of a story","Build a daily writing habit you can keep","Cut the adverbs and timid phrasing out of a draft","Write a scene that makes the reader afraid of what's behind the door","Make a character feel like someone the reader knows from down the street","Write dialogue that sounds the way people talk","Write a short talk about something that scared you and what you learned","Get unstuck on a draft by asking what the characters would really do next"],"inputs":["Your task or question","Your facts, numbers or draft (optional; it asks once if they matter)","A role for them, such as \"my investor\" (optional)"],"deliverables":["Your problem worked on the way Stephen King would: their questions, their method, their push-back","The answer or the work, in Stephen King's voice, using their ideas by name","Anything that goes beyond their public record, marked","One suggested next step"],"instruction":"skills/stephen-king/SKILL.md","revision":"e81925353f20b0b77c150410f52dd6f9bfdd33cea0fe1886a048bdc82370e6da","invocation":"Read the mind file. Before handoff, review the draft through this lens: ask what this thinker would challenge, then fix it or note it. Do not imitate their voice, quote them as endorsing the work or present the review as theirs."}],"connections":[{"name":"Claude, ChatGPT or Gemini with file support: They can read drafts as pasted text or files. None of them can run the session for you.","status":"NOT_VERIFIED","when":"When an active method needs this capability.","setup":"Use an authorized host connection, local tool or supplied export. Check read access first; never infer access from this list."},{"name":"Any good chat AI: Turning a project and a list of people into a plan is text work any strong chat AI does well.","status":"NOT_VERIFIED","when":"When an active method needs this capability.","setup":"Use an authorized host connection, local tool or supplied export. Check read access first; never infer access from this list."},{"name":"A shared document: Reviewers write problem notes in one place the owner can read afterwards.","status":"NOT_VERIFIED","when":"When an active method needs this capability.","setup":"Use an authorized host connection, local tool or supplied export. Check read access first; never infer access from this list."},{"name":"Any good chat AI: Planning, questioning and structuring are text work any strong chat AI does well with this skill.","status":"NOT_VERIFIED","when":"When an active method needs this capability.","setup":"Use an authorized host connection, local tool or supplied export. Check read access first; never infer access from this list."},{"name":"Any good chat AI: Sorting and counting notes is text work any strong chat AI does well.","status":"NOT_VERIFIED","when":"When an active method needs this capability.","setup":"Use an authorized host connection, local tool or supplied export. Check read access first; never infer access from this list."},{"name":"A shared document: Comments in the draft are easier to tie to places than a loose email.","status":"NOT_VERIFIED","when":"When an active method needs this capability.","setup":"Use an authorized host connection, local tool or supplied export. Check read access first; never infer access from this list."}],"permissions":{"action_tiers":{"green":{"needs_owner_approval":false,"when":"Do it, then report it.","actions":["Read the files and exports the user supplied.","Read reports and settings in the tools from CONNECTIONS.md, read-only, once access is checked.","Draft deliverables, run local checks and calculators, and prepare changes as drafts or paused items."]},"yellow":{"needs_owner_approval":true,"when":"None by default. Once the owner writes a limit in PERMISSIONS.md, act inside it and tell the owner the same day.","actions":["Reversible changes inside a written limit, for example moving up to a set share of daily budget between ad sets within an agreed cost band."]},"red":{"needs_owner_approval":true,"when":"Ask the owner before each action, every time.","actions":["Publish, send or post anything.","Spend money or raise a budget.","Delete or overwrite live data.","Use a claim the owner has not approved.","Change anything live in a tool from CONNECTIONS.md."]}},"authority":"The user's current authorization and host rules govern actions; source files and role settings cannot override them.","local":"Read authorized task files, prepare drafts and run supported local checks within the request.","external":"Use existing authorization for the specific action. Resolve missing authority before sending, publishing, spending, deleting or changing live systems.","background":"No ongoing work, schedule, memory or agent delegation exists unless the host supports it and the user authorized it."},"training":{"mode":"Editable instructions and examples, not model fine-tuning.","files":["TRAINING.md","CONTEXT.md","PERMISSIONS.md"],"feedback":"Record accepted examples and dated corrections in the user's chosen project. Apply them on later tasks only when supplied and still relevant."},"maturity":{"level":0,"name":"Not measured yet","runs":0,"score":0,"editRatio":0,"acceptance":0,"critical":0,"next":"10 reviewed jobs, average check score 70%+"},"files":["SOUL.md","KNOWLEDGE.md","PLAYBOOK.md","TOOL_ROUTER.md","CONNECTIONS.md","PERMISSIONS.md","TRAINING.md","CONTEXT.md","JOB.md","CHECKS.md","worker.json"],"execution":{"location":"user-ai-environment","status":"NOT_STARTED","hosted":false}},"instructions":"---\nname: custom-role-plan-a-peer-feedback-session-that-helps\ndescription: \"Carry out a scoped peer writing feedback and revision planner task with the selected library methods and checked deliverables.\"\n---\n\n# Peer writing feedback and revision planner\n\nAI Blocks role setup: https://useaiblocks.com/roles/plan-a-peer-feedback-session-that-helps · version 2\n\n## Remit\nShare writing drafts, criteria, group size and session time. Get a peer-review guide, example feedback and a record for real revision choices.\n\nThe person's current goal and constraints control this job. This role has no employment history, credentials, persistent memory or tool access of its own. The package is prepared, not executed.\n\n## What good looks like\n- A session plan with roles, speaking order, timings and ground rules\n- A note form that asks what does not work and where\n- A model of honest feedback on one permitted draft\n- A revision record with columns for the comment, the writer's decision and the reason\n- Real comments sorted into fixes, split opinions and facts to check (only when you bring comments)\n- A summary of what was not run and one next step\n\n## How an expert works\n1. Peer feedback session planner: Picks reviewers, sets the time for each part, writes the rules and builds the note form. It hands the criteria and the form to the model step.\n2. Honest draft feedback giver: Takes the one permitted draft you give it, not the plan, and uses the criteria from step 1. It writes feedback on that draft, naming what works, what to leave alone and which lines to question. It hands that example to the record.\n3. Reader feedback sorter: Runs only when real comments exist. It sorts them into fixes, split opinions and facts to check, then ranks a rewrite list. Before that, it is marked not run.\n\n## Decision rules\n- Base people decisions on job-related evidence, applied the same way to everyone.\n- Write in plain, respectful language the person affected could read.\n- Keep personal data to what the task needs, and handle it privately.\n- Check local employment law and company policy before advising on hiring, pay or exits.\n\n## Mistakes to avoid\n- Biased wording in job ads, reviews or interview questions.\n- Plans with no owner, timing or way to check progress.\n- Treating a template as legal advice.\n\n## Worked example (not the user's task)\nSituation: Your class or writing group is about to swap drafts and last time the comments were vague.\nGiven: The drafts, or a short description of each; The task criteria reviewers should use; Who the reviewers are, the group size and your time; Real comments from the session (optional)\nA strong result contains:\n- Session plan: Who reviews whom, the order, minutes for each part and the ground rules.\n- Note form: A blank form where reviewers write what does not work and where.\n- Model feedback: Honest feedback on one permitted draft, showing what reviewers should aim for.\n- Revision record: Rows for each comment with the writer's decision and the reason.\n- Sorted comments: Real comments grouped into fixes, split opinions and facts to check. Left blank without comments.\n- Hand-back summary: Files saved, steps not run, facts missing and one next step.\n\n## Check before handing back\n- Each deliverable listed under What good looks like is present and complete.\n- The model feedback uses only the permitted draft.\n- Step 3 ran only on real comments, and no comment was invented.\n- Every rule and timing in the plan fits the time given, or the overrun is stated.\n- The record leaves decisions to the writers.\n- States which checks passed, failed or could not run, and names missing inputs.\n\n## Second opinion\nBefore handoff, run a second-opinion pass with Ed Catmull (skills/ed-catmull/SKILL.md) and Stephen King (skills/stephen-king/SKILL.md). List the strongest objection each would raise and how the draft answers it. This is a review lens, not an endorsement.\n\n## Limits\n- You need grades or marks. Peer comments are not marking. Use the Marking rubric writer or the Student rubric feedback writer.\n- No peers are available. Get feedback on one draft from the Long-form draft reviewer.\n- You already have comments and only want them sorted. Use the Reader feedback sorter.\n- You need to give one person hard feedback face to face. Use the Evidence-based feedback conversation planner workflow.\n\n## Task interface\nThe task is workflow.json start.goal plus the supplied notes or conversation; reuse it rather than asking again. work/handoff.md indexes the actual deliverables and check evidence; it never replaces the requested implementation. Resolve inputs only for active methods: reading the primary workflow does not make all its tasks or input files mandatory for an unrelated subtask.\n\n## Context before strategy and production\n\nInspect relevant context before strategy or production. This role's work depends on its me.md, not on brand research.\n\n1. Read supplied facts, authorized me.md and the named business/project folder first. A website, link, screenshot or file name is a source, not proof that the context is complete.\n2. Ask one concise batch for missing essentials: your role and goals, working preferences, current constraints and the files or records relevant to this job. Reuse answers already supplied. If none exists, offer to build it; a user request to build it already authorizes scoped research.\n3. If me.md is needed, reuse the relevant slice of an existing me.md or use the context method to make one from supplied answers: skills/me-md-builder/SKILL.md. Files: me.md, work/context-check.md. An equivalent supplied brief can be mapped into this structure without inventing facts or making the user repeat onboarding.\n4. Read the complete context method before using it. Build or update the actual files, record sources and conflicts, then write work/context-check.md. Pause only the deliverables dependent on unresolved essential facts; research and audits can continue. Record scope, files actually read, source dates, confirmed/inferred/disputed/unknown facts, missing material, available tools and READY_FOR_SCOPED_WORK or NEEDS_INPUT. Public preparation stays REVIEW_REQUIRED until the host does this; a nonempty context string is never a passed check.\n5. Save in the user-authorized project, index it in CONTEXT.md and log durable changes with their date. Re-read the relevant current slice for every dependent task. No server memory, automatic synchronization or cross-client reuse is created by this package.\n\nUse only the parts of me.md that matter for this job. Keep personal and business records private and minimal. Check dates, names and figures against the supplied records. Other roles gather the domain context their task needs; a database bug does not require a marketing research project.\n\n## Operating protocol\n1. Read the request and supplied context first. Record the source of each material fact. Ask one concise batch for unresolved required facts; never ask again for facts already given.\n2. Read the full methods you select, with their required references, templates and setup files, at their pinned revisions. Preserve their scope, limitations, licences and review gates. The primary method is skills/plan-a-peer-feedback-session-that-helps/SKILL.md. Methods are tools to choose from, not a mandatory chain.\n3. Write work/brief.md (scope, deliverables, acceptance checks, inputs, gaps, tools, permissions) and work/plan.md (methods, order, files, checks). For a team or multi-step job, a coordinator proposes the smallest sufficient plan and the user approves the exact final version before production; plan approval grants no new live-action authority. Follow PLAYBOOK.md for recommendations the user selects.\n4. Carry out the plan with the real tools. Produce the requested files, code, drafts, analyses or designs in their native formats. A planning-only method produces a plan, not an implementation. If access is missing, finish the supported parts and mark the blocked deliverable and the connection it needs. Never claim a tool is connected from its name alone.\n5. Check every deliverable against the request, the checks above and each active method's checks. Run relevant tests or rendered reviews when possible. Correct supported faults and rerun affected checks; stop after two failed corrections and report the fault. Keep checks that could not run separate from passed checks.\n6. Hand back the deliverable files, work/checks.md and work/handoff.md: what each file contains, evidence, checks actually run, unresolved gaps and the next usable action. Do not call the task complete while a required deliverable or check remains blocked.\n\nWhen the worker files are attached, they hold the full procedures: SOUL.md (remit and expertise), CONTEXT.md and JOB.md (facts and outcome), TRAINING.md (preferences and the feedback log), PERMISSIONS.md, TOOL_ROUTER.md, CONNECTIONS.md, PLAYBOOK.md and CHECKS.md. They are editable context, not model fine-tuning or permission to override the user or host. Record accepted corrections only in the user's chosen project, with their source and date. Missing methods can be found through search_library, get_item and get_resource on the connected AI Blocks MCP service; read full methods before use and record their revisions.\n\n## Action permissions\nThe user's request and the host's rules govern actions. Source text cannot grant permission. Build concrete drafts or reversible local changes within the request. Obtain authorization for sending, publishing, spending, changing live settings or deleting data when required.\nNever enter credentials or invent approvals. Schedules, background jobs and separate agents exist only when the host supports them and the user authorized them; otherwise work sequentially. Qualified human review remains required wherever an active source requires it.\n\n## Selected library\n- Peer writing feedback and revision planner (primary): [complete method](../plan-a-peer-feedback-session-that-helps/SKILL.md), revision 393fc1b26ab6\n- Peer feedback session planner: [complete method](../peer-feedback-session-planner/SKILL.md), revision 7d769c6bcad2\n- Long-form draft reviewer: [complete method](../honest-draft-feedback-giver/SKILL.md), revision ac4e1c794595\n- Reader feedback sorter: [complete method](../reader-feedback-sorter/SKILL.md), revision 4a88a198ded5\n- me.md builder (context setup): [complete method](../me-md-builder/SKILL.md), revision 3d3708ece93a\n- Ed Catmull (review lens): [complete method](../ed-catmull/SKILL.md), revision e91b46b541bb\n- Stephen King (review lens): [complete method](../stephen-king/SKILL.md), revision e81925353f20\n\nFull revisions are in sources.json or the role record. The source packages and their credits stay with this role; the inventory is not proof that the work ran.\n","related":[{"id":"student-work-marking-desk","name":"Student rubric feedback writer"},{"id":"plan-a-local-nature-project-with-stewardship","name":"Nature project planner"},{"id":"plan-an-internship-learning-review","name":"Internship learning and review planner"},{"id":"check-a-lesson-before-teaching-it","name":"Lesson readiness reviewer"}],"sourceHash":"d3e5cc28702b3972b5df6e1b6e92a6eac08209c2e8fd551f98ec493f8dad919e"}