---
name: headline-psychologist
description: "Draft and compare audience-aware headlines when copy needs clearer relevance and curiosity without clickbait or unsupported promises."
risk: safe
source: community
date_added: "2026-04-04"
---
Use a marketing planning and audience-research lens. Your task is to engineer headlines and subject-facing titles that capture attention, create information gaps, and trigger the emotional state needed for the reader to continue.

## When to Use
- Use when headlines need stronger stopping power, curiosity, and relevance without becoming vague clickbait.
- Use when testing multiple headline angles for ads, landing pages, emails, or social posts.

## Evidence and scope

Use observed audience research and verified product facts. Psychological interpretations and the author-year references below are inherited conceptual context, not validated evidence for this exact workflow or a guaranteed conversion effect. Before using a scientific claim externally, verify the actual publication, method and applicability; omit unsupported claims. This is marketing planning, not clinical diagnosis. Do not infer sensitive traits or exploit vulnerabilities.

Original contribution: [PR 451](https://github.com/sickn33/agentic-awesome-skills/pull/451) by MMEHDI0606; [immutable source snapshot](https://github.com/MMEHDI0606/antigravity-awesome-skills/blob/9c61357e3e6bb167946036f52ac1e28fc82e04d0/skills/headline-psychologist/SKILL.md). This identifies the contributed instructions, not scientific validation or a new upstream endorsement.

## CONTEXT GATHERING

Before writing headlines, establish:

1. **The Target Human** - psychographic profile and awareness stage.
2. **The Objective** - open, click, read, or convert.
3. **The Output** - ad headline, landing page hero, article title, or notification title.
4. **Constraints** - channel, truncation limits, brand voice, and ethical limits.

If the objective or channel is unclear, ask before proceeding.

## PSYCHOLOGICAL FRAMEWORK: CURIOSITY-CONTRAST HEADLINE ENGINE

### Mechanism
A headline works when it interrupts expected patterns, signals relevance to the self, and opens a curiosity gap that the brain wants to close. The best headlines are not merely catchy; they are stage-appropriate attention devices that promise meaning without collapsing into clickbait (Loewenstein curiosity-gap logic; Green & Brock, 2000; Dragojevic et al., 2024; Moyer-Gusé et al., 2022).

### Execution Steps

**Step 1 - Identify the required mental state**
Decide whether the headline should create urgency, curiosity, reassurance, surprise, or identity resonance.
*Planning hypothesis (verify before presenting as research): attention is guided by affect, relevance, and prediction error, not by novelty alone (Song et al., 2024; Bower et al., 2022).*

**Step 2 - Choose the information gap**
Create a gap the reader can plausibly close by reading on.
*Planning hypothesis (verify before presenting as research): curiosity rises when the answer is near enough to feel attainable (Loewenstein; Green & Brock, 2000).*

**Step 3 - Add self-relevance**
Make the reader recognize themselves, their problem, or their aspiration in the headline.
*Planning hypothesis (verify before presenting as research): self-referential processing increases engagement and persuasion (Moyer-Gusé et al., 2022; Ooms et al., 2019).*

**Step 4 - Calibrate the tension level**
Keep the headline aligned with the audience's trust and awareness level.
*Planning hypothesis (verify before presenting as research): high-arousal cues work only when the audience does not experience them as spam or manipulation (Quick et al., 2018; Lavoie & Quick, 2013).*

**Step 5 - Remove clickbait residue**
Check that the content genuinely resolves the promise.
*Planning hypothesis (verify before presenting as research): trust degradation from overpromising is costly and difficult to repair (Nagy et al., 2022; Rowley et al., 2015).*

## DECISION MATRIX

### Variable: awareness stage
- If unaware -> lead with problem recognition or identity relevance.
- If problem aware -> lead with pain, cost, or contradiction.
- If solution aware -> lead with differentiation or mechanism.
- If product aware -> lead with proof or a precise benefit.
- If most aware -> lead with the next logical action.

### Variable: channel
- If the channel is email -> optimize for clarity and inbox trust.
- If the channel is ads -> optimize for short-form pattern interrupt.
- If the channel is landing pages -> optimize for relevance and continuity.
- If the channel is social -> optimize for conversational tension and shareability.

### Variable: trust level
- If trust is low -> use clarity over mystery.
- If trust is moderate -> use curiosity with proof cues.
- If trust is high -> use bolder tension and specificity.

## FAILURE MODES - DO NOT DO THESE

**Failure Mode 1**
- Agents typically: write vague curiosity bait.
- Why it fails psychologically: the brain cannot predict a useful payoff.
- Instead: make the gap concrete and answerable.

**Failure Mode 2**
- Agents typically: optimize for clicks while breaking promise continuity.
- Why it fails psychologically: trust collapses once the reader lands.
- Instead: ensure the content resolves the headline.

**Failure Mode 3**
- Agents typically: ignore awareness stage and use one headline style for all.
- Why it fails psychologically: different stages need different attention triggers.
- Instead: generate stage-specific variants.

## ETHICAL GUARDRAILS

This skill must:
- Be attention-grabbing without deceiving.
- Preserve promise continuity from headline to content.
- Avoid manipulative fear or fake urgency.

The line between persuasion and manipulation is creating a real curiosity gap versus manufacturing false scarcity or false certainty to lure the click. Never cross it.

## SKILL CHAINING

Optional context from related skills (equivalent supplied research is sufficient; do not create a prerequisite cycle):
- [ ] `@customer-psychographic-profiler`
- [ ] `@awareness-stage-mapper`

This skill's output feeds into:
- [ ] `@copywriting-psychologist`
- [ ] `@subject-line-psychologist`
- [ ] `@pitch-psychologist`

## OUTPUT QUALITY CHECK

Before finalizing output, the agent asks:
- [ ] Does the headline create a real information gap?
- [ ] Is it matched to the audience's awareness stage?
- [ ] Does it feel relevant, not generic?
- [ ] Would the content actually satisfy the promise?
- [ ] Does it preserve trust?

## Example

**User request:**

> Rewrite these headlines for stronger stopping power, curiosity, and relevance without resorting to vague clickbait.

**Illustrative output:** For a verified export feature, compare “Export your records as CSV” with a truthful question-led variant; measure task comprehension and qualified clicks, not curiosity alone.

## Limitations
- Use this skill only when the task clearly matches the scope described above.
- Do not treat the output as a substitute for environment-specific validation, testing, or expert review.
- Stop and ask for clarification if required inputs, permissions, safety boundaries, or success criteria are missing.