Hire an AI behavior evidence reviewer
Describe a character, or two who clash, and what they do and say. You get a profile, a relationship map and what each person would likely do next.
What you give
- The character's name and role in your story, game or script
- What the character does and says, with a few real moments or lines
- Key past events that shaped them, if known (optional)
What you get
- What the character would likely do next in a situation you name
- Flags where a character acts against their own pattern
- The limits of each theory used, and what to check
An example
A character acts in a way that feels wrong, and you cannot say why.
You ask: “Describe a character, or two who clash, and what they do and say. Use the material I attach and ask for anything essential that is missing.”
You get back:
- Evidence. The behaviors and lines it found, so you can correct them before the profile.
- Psychological profile. Traits, attachment style, defense mechanisms, core wound, coping and blind spot, each tied to a named theory.
- Relational dynamics. Power, communication pattern, unspoken contract, trigger points and growth edge for two characters.
An example, not your task.
Hire this specialist
It is free and needs no account. Download the pack, give it to your AI and tell it the job. Your AI asks for anything it is missing, then does the work and checks it.
Related specialists
- Research paper disagreement reviewer
- Research evidence reviewer
- Historian for period accuracy
- Anthropologist
Skills and workflows for this job: Research a topic properly
Details
Everything it can hand back
Your task sets the actual outputs. The specialist picks the methods that cover them.
- A profile with traits, attachment style, defense mechanisms, core wound and blind spot
- A relationship map for two characters, with power, triggers and the unspoken deal
- What the character would likely do next in a situation you name
- Flags where a character acts against their own pattern
- The limits of each theory used, and what to check
How it does the job well
- This is for fiction, games and characters. For a real person's mental health, give no diagnosis and no treatment advice. Say a qualified professional is needed. If someone may be in danger, say to contact local emergency services.
- Do not show trauma as one fixed result. Responses differ: withdrawal, people-pleasing, hypervigilance, high functioning.
- Do not present contested findings as settled. Say so when a result is debated.
- You cannot remember between chats. Tell the user to save the profile and paste it back next time.
- Keep sample wording labelled as examples. Never state an invented figure as a result.
- Never reduce characters to diagnoses. A character can exhibit narcissistic *traits* without being "a narcissist." People are not their DSM codes.
- Distinguish between pop psychology and research-backed psychology. If you cite something, know whether it's peer-reviewed or self-help.
Mistakes it avoids
- Presenting one source or a popular claim as settled.
- Inventing citations, quotes or page numbers.
- Over-generalising across places, periods or groups.
What a good result looks like
An example, not your task: A character acts in a way that feels wrong, and you cannot say why.
- Evidence. The behaviors and lines it found, so you can correct them before the profile.
- Psychological profile. Traits, attachment style, defense mechanisms, core wound, coping and blind spot, each tied to a named theory.
- Relational dynamics. Power, communication pattern, unspoken contract, trigger points and growth edge for two characters.
- Likely next move. What the character would probably do in the situation you name, with a second reading.
- Consistency flags. Scenes where the character acts against their own pattern.
- Limits and open checks. Where each theory is weak, culture notes and facts still missing.
How the work is checked
- Every important claim has a source or is marked as unverified.
- Disagreements between sources are named, not hidden.
- Limits and what to check next are listed.
- States which checks passed, failed or could not run, and names missing inputs.
These checks have not been run against a model yet. Your AI uses them to check its own work.
A second opinion
Before it hands back, your AI reviews the draft the way Alfred Hitchcock and Charlie Munger would. This is a way of reviewing the work. It does not mean they wrote or endorse it.
Capabilities
- Collect the evidence. It lists what the character does and says, and asks once for anything missing. It marks gaps as MISSING.
- Pick the lenses. It picks at least two theories that fit the behavior, such as Big Five, attachment or defense mechanisms.
- Check for stereotypes. It asks whether the pattern is real psychology or shorthand from films, and removes any label that reduces the person to a diagnosis.
- Trace the origin. It proposes which past experience or belief drives the pattern, and labels it as a proposal.
- Project forward. It says what the character would likely do in the situation you name, with a second reading when two fit.
- State the limits. It names where each theory is weak, where culture changes the reading, and what is still unknown.
How the role works
- Checks your task, context and available tools.
- Picks the methods needed and prepares a work plan.
- Carries out supported tasks, with each method's limits and review gates.
- Checks the real deliverables and corrects supported faults.
- Hands back files, evidence and unresolved gaps.
Your specialist's working setup
Download the base specialist without a task form or account. README.md and SETUP.md explain how to use the folder. SOUL.md defines its scope. INTAKE.md asks missing questions inside your AI. PLAYBOOK.md, SKILLS.md, BEST_PRACTICES.md, CHECKS.md and HANDOFF.md guide the work and its checked deliverables.
Complete associated skills, supporting files and licences are included. Choose only the methods needed for the actual task. Keep context, working files and accepted feedback in your AI project.
Use this specialist through MCP or the API
Call prepare_specialist with role_id academic-psychologist only. No task is required to load it. Your AI asks what job you need done, what you want back and which relevant context it can use.
For task-led hiring, call find_specialist, explain the suggested specialists and let the user accept or change the team.
Complete ZIP: Download base specialist. API: GET /api/v1/specialists/academic-psychologist/pack. The host AI supplies its own model, tools and execution; a pack does not connect accounts or run a task.
Inputs and helpful context
The specialist starts from the task brief. Only active methods require their inputs.
For the primary method, when used
- The character's name and role in your story, game or script
- What the character does and says, with a few real moments or lines
- Key past events that shaped them, if known (optional)
- The question you want answered, such as why they pull away after a fight
- The setting and culture they live in (optional)
- Other characters they clash or bond with (optional)
Helpful context (optional)
- Two or three short scenes where the character is under stress.
- Notes on the character's family and past, if you have them.
Tools and access
- Claude, ChatGPT or Gemini: The profile works from pasted notes and scenes, so no files or tools are needed.
Functions and deliverables
- Behavior evidence reviewer: Get a psychology profile of a character or relationship, built on named theories, so their choices and clashes feel real and hold together.
- A profile with traits, attachment style, defense mechanisms, core wound and blind spot
- A relationship map for two characters, with power, triggers and the unspoken deal
- What the character would likely do next in a situation you name
- Flags where a character acts against their own pattern
- The limits of each theory used, and what to check
- Antagonist behavior planner: Build a villain mood scale from calm to dangerous. Paste your setting plan and the person in power. Get warning signs, triggers and costs.
- Three or four moods in order, from calm to dangerous
- A warning sign for each mood that the trapped person can notice
- What the person does in each mood, and what it costs the other
- The small triggers that flip one mood to the next
- The person's sincere reason, in their own words
- Working relationship trust reviewer: Share evidence about people behind a deal or hire. Get a review of their record, incentives and what to check next.
- A rating on ability, honesty, reliability and owner mindset
- The pay structure and what it bends
- Questions to ask people they did not choose
- A verdict: trust, trust with checks or do not trust
- Research paper evidence reviewer: Check how far to trust a research paper. Give it the paper and get a claims review with weak spots, limits and what would settle the question.
- A verdict on how far to trust the main claim
- A table of claims with their evidence and a rating
- Problems ranked from major to minor, each tied to a part of the paper
- A note on what is missing for someone to repeat the work
- A test that would settle the question
- Later work on the paper, marked as searched or from memory
- Research paper and code note writer: Share a paper, repo or messy notes. Get claims, methods and evidence sorted into a clear research folder.
- A research folder with claims, methods and results
- Every claim linked to its supporting table or log
- Results tables copied with exact numbers
- A record of dead ends and decisions
- A short report on what was filled in and what was missing
- Alfred Hitchcock: Plan a suspenseful story, video or talk using Alfred Hitchcock’s recorded approach. Decide what viewers know and map the visual beats before production.
- Your problem worked on the way Alfred Hitchcock would: their questions, their method, their push-back
- The answer or the work, in Alfred Hitchcock's voice, using their ideas by name
- Anything that goes beyond their public record, marked
- One suggested next step
- Charlie Munger: Stress-test a plan using Charlie Munger’s recorded approach. Turn it upside down, examine incentives and ask where your knowledge ends.
- Your problem worked on the way Charlie Munger would: their questions, their method, their push-back
- The answer or the work, in Charlie Munger's voice, using their ideas by name
- Anything that goes beyond their public record, marked
- One suggested next step
Tasks you can use it for
- A character acts in a way that feels wrong, and you cannot say why.
- Two characters keep clashing and you need the real cause of the clash.
- You are writing a character's reaction to loss, stress or conflict.
- You want to check that a character stays consistent across a long story or game.
Limits to check before starting
- You want to diagnose, treat or advise on a real person's mental health: see a qualified professional.
- You want to study how a team at work behaves: use the Organizational psychologist.
- You want plot, structure or point of view: use the Narrative analyst.
- You want to know how a culture shapes behavior: use the Anthropologist agent.
Best way to use this role
Give it one clear outcome, the actual files and a definition of done. Keep the work in one AI project so it can reuse checked context and earlier files.
- Add the pack to your AI as a skill. Or open a new chat and paste SKILL.md, then references/source-agent.md.
- Paste your character notes and a few scenes or lines. Say the one question you want answered.
- Say 'Profile this character. Do not invent a backstory.' Your AI asks once for what is missing.
- Read the list of behaviors it found first. Fix anything it got wrong before you read the profile.
- Check the profile against your story. Keep what fits and ask for a second reading where it does not.
- Save the profile with your story notes. Paste it back in the next chat, because the AI does not remember between chats.
Read it as data
Read the complete role setup as JSON. Connect your AI to the AI Blocks MCP library and read aiblocks://roles/academic-psychologist for its role instructions and pinned sources.
This is a prepared AI role. No task has run. Your AI carries out authorized work using its available tools and reports the actual deliverables and checks.