Hire an AI research report summary and slide-brief writer
Share a report, its sources, audience and sharing limits. Get a plain summary, slide outline and checks across figures and claims.
What you give
- Your finished report (Word, PDF or pasted text)
- The sources behind it, such as data, papers or links
- Who will read the summary and what they must decide
What you get
- A slide brief: one outline, one idea per slide, each linked to its source
- A list of caveats that must stay beside each finding
- A hand-back summary and one next step
An example
You finished a research report and the people who decide will not read all of it.
You ask: “Share a report, its sources, audience and sharing limits. Use the material I attach and ask for anything essential that is missing.”
You get back:
- Executive summary. The findings in plain English for your reader, with caveats and sources kept.
- Slide brief. A slide-by-slide outline built around the decision, each slide linked to its source.
- Fact-check list. Each figure and conclusion, where it appears and whether every version agrees.
An example, not your task.
Hire this specialist
It is free and needs no account. Download the pack, give it to your AI and tell it the job. Your AI asks for anything it is missing, then does the work and checks it.
Related specialists
- Report-to-slide briefing deck builder and reviewer
- Word handout writer and layout reviewer
- Spreadsheet cleanup, data-check and slide-deck builder
- Research poster content and source planner
Skills and workflows for this job: Make documents, sheets and slides
Details
Everything it can hand back
Your task sets the actual outputs. The specialist picks the methods that cover them.
- An executive summary in plain English
- A slide brief: one outline, one idea per slide, each linked to its source
- A fact-check list: each figure and conclusion, where it appears and whether the versions agree
- A list of caveats that must stay beside each finding
- A hand-back summary and one next step
How it does the job well
- Never add a finding, number, date or source that is not in the report or its sources.
- Never drop a caveat, period or limit that changes how a finding should be read. Keep it beside the finding.
- Never publish, send or post anything. Write the versions for the person to use.
- If the report names private people or data and the sharing rules do not allow it, remove or generalise them and say so.
- Pin down the exact question, scope and the standard of evidence needed before searching.
- Prefer primary sources, and say how strong each source is.
- Separate what is established, debated and unknown, with confidence levels.
Mistakes it avoids
- Presenting one source or a popular claim as settled.
- Inventing citations, quotes or page numbers.
- Over-generalising across places, periods or groups.
What a good result looks like
An example, not your task: You finished a research report and the people who decide will not read all of it.
- Executive summary. The findings in plain English for your reader, with caveats and sources kept.
- Slide brief. A slide-by-slide outline built around the decision, each slide linked to its source.
- Fact-check list. Each figure and conclusion, where it appears and whether every version agrees.
- Caveats to keep. The qualifiers, periods and sources that must stay beside each finding.
- Hand-back summary. Files saved, MISSING lines, checks that could not run and one next step.
How the work is checked
- Every figure, date and source in the summary and slides appears in the report or its sources.
- Each caveat from the report is beside the finding it limits.
- The fact-check list records every difference between report, summary and slides, or says there are none.
- Nothing private appears unless the sharing rules allow it.
- States which checks passed, failed or could not run, and names missing inputs.
These checks have not been run against a model yet. Your AI uses them to check its own work.
A second opinion
Before it hands back, your AI reviews the draft the way George Orwell and Kurt Vonnegut would. This is a way of reviewing the work. It does not mean they wrote or endorse it.
Capabilities
- Plain English editor. Edits the findings for your reader. Keeps the uncertainty and caveats that matter. Hands the plain version to the slide step.
- Presentation builder. Turns the supported findings into a slide outline around the decision, one idea per slide. This workflow uses the outline, not a finished deck.
- Proofreader. Fixes typos and wording in the summary and the slide text. The workflow then compares each figure, date and source across the report, summary and slides.
How the role works
- Checks your task, context and available tools.
- Picks the methods needed and prepares a work plan.
- Carries out supported tasks, with each method's limits and review gates.
- Checks the real deliverables and corrects supported faults.
- Hands back files, evidence and unresolved gaps.
Your specialist's working setup
Download the base specialist without a task form or account. README.md and SETUP.md explain how to use the folder. SOUL.md defines its scope. INTAKE.md asks missing questions inside your AI. PLAYBOOK.md, SKILLS.md, BEST_PRACTICES.md, CHECKS.md and HANDOFF.md guide the work and its checked deliverables.
Complete associated skills, supporting files and licences are included. Choose only the methods needed for the actual task. Keep context, working files and accepted feedback in your AI project.
Use this specialist through MCP or the API
Call prepare_specialist with role_id make-a-research-report-easier-to-share only. No task is required to load it. Your AI asks what job you need done, what you want back and which relevant context it can use.
For task-led hiring, call find_specialist, explain the suggested specialists and let the user accept or change the team.
Complete ZIP: Download base specialist. API: GET /api/v1/specialists/make-a-research-report-easier-to-share/pack. The host AI supplies its own model, tools and execution; a pack does not connect accounts or run a task.
Inputs and helpful context
The specialist starts from the task brief. Only active methods require their inputs.
For the primary method, when used
- Your finished report (Word, PDF or pasted text)
- The sources behind it, such as data, papers or links
- Who will read the summary and what they must decide
- What you may share and what must stay private
- Length limits, such as one page or ten slides (optional)
Helpful context (optional)
- The data tables behind the report's key figures.
- A named reviewer who knows the research.
Tools and access
- Claude, ChatGPT or Gemini with file support: They can read a long report as a file and keep track of figures across versions.
- Any good chat AI: Editing a draft with a fixed list of moves is text work any strong chat AI does well with this skill.
- A read-aloud tool: Hearing the result spoken shows where a line does not sound like you.
Functions and deliverables
- Research report summary and slide-brief writer: Share a report, its sources, audience and sharing limits. Get a plain summary, slide outline and checks across figures and claims.
- An executive summary in plain English
- A slide brief: one outline, one idea per slide, each linked to its source
- A fact-check list: each figure and conclusion, where it appears and whether the versions agree
- A list of caveats that must stay beside each finding
- A hand-back summary and one next step
- Plain English editor: Paste a draft and get it back in plain English, with every cut explained and a read-aloud check. Edit stiff emails, reports and pages.
- The edited text in plain words
- A list of every cut or swap, with its reason
- The point of the piece in one sentence
- Questions where a fact was missing
- Presentation builder: Turn your outline, report or notes into a slide deck built for your audience. Get a presentation builder result in Marp, reveal.js, PPTX or Google Slides.
- A complete slide deck file in your chosen format
- A takeaway headline on every slide
- A suggested chart, image or layout for each slide
- Speaker notes for each slide
- A list of claims for you to check before you present
- Text proofreader: Proofread your text for grammar, spelling and punctuation against a style guide. Get clean copy, every change listed and a readability score (a reading-level estimate).
- Corrected text
- Annotated list of every change
- Reading-level estimate
- Tone notes
- Research paper and code note writer: Share a paper, repo or messy notes. Get claims, methods and evidence sorted into a clear research folder.
- A research folder with claims, methods and results
- Every claim linked to its supporting table or log
- Results tables copied with exact numbers
- A record of dead ends and decisions
- A short report on what was filled in and what was missing
- George Orwell: Rewrite a memo, report or announcement in plain words using George Orwell’s recorded approach. Cut padding and reveal what vague labels hide.
- Your problem worked on the way George Orwell would: their questions, their method, their push-back
- The answer or the work, in George Orwell's voice, using their ideas by name
- Anything that goes beyond their public record, marked
- One suggested next step
- Kurt Vonnegut: Review plain writing or a story’s shape using Kurt Vonnegut’s recorded ideas. Cut clutter, trace changes in fortune and question the perfect plan.
- Your problem worked on the way Kurt Vonnegut would: their questions, their method, their push-back
- The answer or the work, in Kurt Vonnegut's voice, using their ideas by name
- Anything that goes beyond their public record, marked
- One suggested next step
Tasks you can use it for
- You finished a research report and the people who decide will not read all of it.
- You need a one-page summary and a few slides from the same report.
- A short version of your findings left out a caveat last time.
- You must share findings with people outside your field.
Limits to check before starting
- You want the report turned into a finished editable deck. Use Report-to-slide briefing deck builder and reviewer.
- You have survey results, not a report. Use Survey results checker and briefing planner.
- You want to check a report's claims against sources, not shorten it. Use the Unsupported claim spotter.
- Your sources disagree and you must compare them. Use Research paper disagreement reviewer.
Best way to use this role
Give it one clear outcome, the actual files and a definition of done. Keep the work in one AI project so it can reuse checked context and earlier files.
- Download the handoff pack. It is a zip with HANDOFF.md and every skill file this workflow uses.
- Give the folder to Claude, ChatGPT or Gemini and say "Follow HANDOFF.md".
- Attach the report and its sources. Say who will read the summary and what they must decide.
- Read the fact-check list first. Settle every difference between the report and the short versions.
- Check that each caveat is still next to the finding it belongs to.
- Take the slide brief to a slide tool, or use the Turn a report into an editable briefing deck workflow to build it.
Read it as data
Read the complete role setup as JSON. Connect your AI to the AI Blocks MCP library and read aiblocks://roles/make-a-research-report-easier-to-share for its role instructions and pinned sources.
This is a prepared AI role. No task has run. Your AI carries out authorized work using its available tools and reports the actual deliverables and checks.