Hire an AI facilities contract cost comparison reviewer

Everything it can hand back

Your task sets the actual outputs. The specialist picks the methods that cover them.

• A side-by-side table of cost over the contract period, start-up cost and exit effort for each contractor
• A risk table and a proceed, negotiate or pass call for each, with negotiation points
• A plain-words summary of each contract: your duties, theirs, money and dates, how it ends, clauses to watch
• Questions to put to each contractor or to your reviewer
• A list of facts it could not verify, such as insurance, past performance and savings

How it does the job well

• Name the asset, the threat and the impact before recommending controls.
• Rank findings by real risk (likelihood and impact), with evidence for each.
• Prefer fixes that remove a problem over warnings that rely on people.
• Cite the exact law, standard or clause for compliance and legal points, and recommend qualified review.

Mistakes it avoids

• Inventing facts, prices, dates, permissions, quotes or completed actions.
• Comparing proposals priced for different sites, service levels or periods without saying so.
• Re-running successful steps with unchanged inputs or hiding a failed check.
• Treating a sales summary as the contract.
• Long lists of generic issues with no evidence they apply.
• Testing or scanning systems without permission.

What a good result looks like

An example, not your task: You have two or three contractor proposals for cleaning, security, maintenance or grounds and need one comparison.

• Scope and source coverage. The sites, service, period and each proposal and contract that was read.
• Step 1 proposal comparison. Cost, start-up and exit effort side by side, risks, and a proceed, negotiate or pass call.
• Step 2 contract summaries. Per contractor: duties, money and dates, how it ends, clauses to watch and questions.
• Unverified facts. Insurance, performance and savings claims that need a record before you rely on them.
• Hand-back summary. Each saved file, any step not run, the checks missed and one next step.

How the work is checked

• Scope, term and frequency use the same basis for every contractor. Insurance, performance and savings stay unverified without records.
• Every figure and date traces to a source or is labelled an assumption.
• The original files stay intact, and saved results have distinct names.
• Each required component check ran, or the run stopped and says which check could not pass.
• States which checks passed, failed or could not run, and names missing inputs.

These checks have not been run against a model yet. Your AI uses them to check its own work.

Capabilities

• Compare the proposals. Puts service coverage, total cost, start-up, transition and exit effort for each contractor on the same sites and the same contract period.
• Summarise each contract. Sets out the notice, renewal, access, liability and service duties from each actual contract, for a qualified reviewer.

How the role works

1. Checks your task, context and available tools.
2. Picks the methods needed and prepares a work plan.
3. Carries out supported tasks, with each method's limits and review gates.
4. Checks the real deliverables and corrects supported faults.
5. Hands back files, evidence and unresolved gaps.

Your specialist's working setup

Download the base specialist without a task form or account. README.md and SETUP.md explain how to use the folder. SOUL.md defines its scope. INTAKE.md asks missing questions inside your AI. PLAYBOOK.md, SKILLS.md, BEST_PRACTICES.md, CHECKS.md and HANDOFF.md guide the work and its checked deliverables.

Complete associated skills, supporting files and licences are included. Choose only the methods needed for the actual task. Keep context, working files and accepted feedback in your AI project.

Use this specialist through MCP or the API

Call prepare_specialist with role_id compare-facilities-service-contract-options only. No task is required to load it. Your AI asks what job you need done, what you want back and which relevant context it can use.

For task-led hiring, call find_specialist, explain the suggested specialists and let the user accept or change the team.

Complete ZIP: Download base specialist. API: GET /api/v1/specialists/compare-facilities-service-contract-options/pack. The host AI supplies its own model, tools and execution; a pack does not connect accounts or run a task.

Inputs and helpful context

The specialist starts from the task brief. Only active methods require their inputs.

For the primary method, when used

• Each contractor's proposal, priced for the same sites and the same contract period
• Each contractor's full contract terms, pasted in full
• Your site list, the service you need and how often
• What matters most, such as price, exit terms or cover for absences
• Your current contractor's terms and results (optional)
• Service reports, complaints or references for each contractor (optional)

Helpful context (optional)

• Approved examples of a good result.
• A named reviewer and their acceptance rules.

Tools and access

• A capable chat AI with file support: Read the full pack and supplied sources; connected actions need the corresponding authorized tools.
• Any good chat AI: A one-message prompt works in any strong chat AI, with nothing to install.

Functions and deliverables

• Facilities contract cost comparison reviewer: Compare facilities service coverage and full costs. Summarise contract duties and questions for review, using the same basis for each offer.
  • A side-by-side table of cost over the contract period, start-up cost and exit effort for each contractor
  • A risk table and a proceed, negotiate or pass call for each, with negotiation points
  • A plain-words summary of each contract: your duties, theirs, money and dates, how it ends, clauses to watch
  • Questions to put to each contractor or to your reviewer
  • A list of facts it could not verify, such as insurance, past performance and savings
• Vendor comparison writer: Compare vendor proposals or review a renewal. Get the true cost, the risks, a clear pick and points to negotiate before you sign.
  • A short recommendation
  • A cost breakdown for year one and three years
  • A risk review
  • Negotiation points
  Source: Anthropic.
• Contract plain-language summary writer: Share a contract and say which side you are on. Get a short summary of duties, money, exit terms and clauses to question.
  • A summary under 300 words
  • Clauses to watch, with section numbers
  • What is vague or missing
  • Questions to ask the other side
• Contract comparison spreadsheet builder: Share contracts and points to find. Get one cited spreadsheet row per contract. Verify before relying on it.
  • Spreadsheet, one row per contract
  • Citation for each answer
  • Flags for absent, unfound or unclear
  • Short summary of patterns
  Source: Anthropic.
• me.md builder: Answer a few questions, or let your AI use what it remembers. Get one private file that tells any AI who you are.
  • One me.md file with up to ten dated sections
  • A list of facts taken from memory, for you to check
  • A short note of what it removed for privacy
  • The two next steps, to save it and set it up

Tasks you can use it for

• You have two or three contractor proposals for cleaning, security, maintenance or grounds and need one comparison.
• A quote looks cheap and you want to see its notice period, renewal and exit terms before you sign.
• You are choosing a replacement for a contractor who is not delivering.
• You need to show a manager or board why one contractor was chosen.

Limits to check before starting

• You are comparing prices for goods from suppliers: use Supplier quote cost and risk analyst.
• You are comparing freight quotes: use Freight quote reviewer.
• You already have a contractor and are renewing: use Contract renewal and negotiation planner.
• You need a lawyer's reading of the liability or termination wording. This gives a plain summary for a qualified reviewer, not legal advice.

Best way to use this role

Give it one clear outcome, the actual files and a definition of done. Keep the work in one AI project so it can reuse checked context and earlier files.

• Download the pack. It has a workflow file and one SKILL.md for each of its two steps. Add them to your AI, such as Claude, ChatGPT or Gemini.
• Attach each proposal and each contract in full. Say which sites are covered, which service you need and for how long.
• Say what matters most to you. If any proposal covers different sites, a different period or a different service level, say so, and the comparison will flag it.
• Ask the AI to follow the workflow file, save each step's result and stop if a required check fails.
• Read the unverified facts and the contract questions before you rely on the table. Take the clause questions to a qualified reviewer.

Read it as data

Read the complete role setup as JSON. Connect your AI to the AI Blocks MCP library and read aiblocks://roles/compare-facilities-service-contract-options for its role instructions and pinned sources.

This is a prepared AI role. No task has run. Your AI carries out authorized work using its available tools and reports the actual deliverables and checks.