AI Blocks › Check contracts and rules
Compare facilities service contract options
Share the source files. Get a service comparison, contract differences and review questions.
Compare facilities service contract options is a free AI workflow for the job "Check contracts and rules". It guides your AI through several skills in order, passing each step's output to the next.
Free · No account · Made by AI Blocks · Thinking: high
What it does
A service comparison, contract differences and review questions. Give your AI the source material listed below and install the complete pack. It uses the component skills in the stated order, saves each result and checks the handoff before continuing. Scope, term and frequency use the same basis; insurance, performance and savings remain unverified without records. Missing tools or evidence stay visible in the final summary.
You give it
- Comparable contractor proposals, full current terms, scope, service frequency, performance evidence and decision criteria.
- The intended reader, deadline and limits on what may be changed.
- Earlier work and approved examples, if available.
- Your question (optional)
You get
- A service comparison, contract differences and review questions.
- Step files with evidence, unresolved facts and actual checks completed.
- A hand-back summary and one practical next step.
Use it when
- You need a service comparison, contract differences and review questions.
- The relevant facts are spread across files or notes and need one consistent review.
- You want the work and its checks saved so another person can review it.
Steps
- Vendor comparison writer: Name a vendor or two proposals. Get the cost, risks and a clear pick, with points to negotiate.
- Plain-words contract summary: Paste a contract. Get a two-minute summary of what you owe, what they owe and the risky clauses.
How to use it
- Download the complete pack and add its governing file and component skills to your AI.
- Share the sources listed above and say which result you need.
- Ask the AI to follow the governing file, save each result and stop on a failed required check.
- Review the files, missing facts and proposed actions before using the result.